REPORT FOR I 90S. 
367 
R. hirtifolius, M. and ^V., var. moliissinms, Rogers ? Welsh 
Newton, Hereford, 12th Sept. 1908. Only hesitatingly ascribed to 
this form (on my suggestion) by Rev. W. M. Rogers. I understand 
M. Sudre, to whom I had sent it, to proi:)Ose publishing it as a new 
species. — A. Ley. With only one sheet before me of this very late- 
collected and apparently shade-grown form, I am not prepared to 
write very confidently. But I see no justification whatever for 
making a new species, or separating it from our aggregate R. 
hirtifolius. On the whole it seems nearer to var. danicus than to 
inollissimiis, though different from the former and quite like the 
latter in the weak acicular prickles of the panicle. Our moUissimus 
is apparently unknown on the Continent. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. mucronatoides, A. Ley, MS. New Radnor, loth Sept. 
1908. These were gathered in company with Rev. A. Ley, in a 
hedge at the base of a hill marked “ Vron ” in the map, near to 
New Radnor. — L. Cummings. Also from Mr. Ley. 
R. orthodados, Ley. Dol-y-bont, Llanfihangel, near Aberyst- 
wyth, and Llyprant Valley, Cardiganshire, v.-c. 46. — W. H. Painter. 
New County record. Respecting the Llyprant Valley specimens, 
these cannot, I believe, be kept distinct from R. orthodados, Ley, 
which shows considerable variations, except in stem clothing, both 
in Monmouthshire and West Gloucestershire, as well as in Belgian. 
This form goes olf towards R. lentiginosus. — ^V. M. R. 
R. hypolencus, Lefv. and Muell. Dol-y-bont, Llanfihangel, near 
Aberystwyth, Cardiganshire, v.-c. 46, 13th July 1908. New County 
record. — W. PI. Painter. Yes. — W. M. R. 
R. ? Mossbridge, S. Lancs., v.-c. 59, Aug. 1908. — J. A. 
Wh ELDON. R. Borreri, Bell Salt. New for v.-c. 59. — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. oigodadus, M. and W., var. Neivbouldii, Rogers ? Woods, 
Welsh Newton, Herefordshire, 12th Sept. 1908. Thus named by 
Rev. W. M. Rogers, but only “probably off type.” M. Sudre 
writes concerning this plant “ R. foliosus, W. and N., or micux 
coryvibosus, P. J. Muell.” R. corymbosus, P. J. Muell, I do not 
know ; R. foliosus it certainly cannot be, if British batologists are 
right in the plants they place under that species. — A. Ley. 
R. oigodadus, M. and ^V., var. Newbouldii, Rogers ? Another 
form. Welsh Newton, Herefordshire, 12th Sept. 1908, and Demesne 
’Wood, Garway, Herefordshire, 2nd Oct. 1908. Again named by 
Rev. W. M. Rogers with hesitation, and as a f. M. Sudre calls 
this R. obscurus, Kalt., sub-species erraticus, Sudre.” This is 
