REPORT FOR 1909. 
467 
Euphrasia Kerneri, Wettst,, Chipstead, Surrey, v.-c. 17, on the 
chalk, Aug. 14, 1909. — C. E. Salmon, Very characteristic E. 
Kerneri. — E. S. Marshall. Beautiful specimens of the true 
plant. — C. Bucknall and J. W. White. Yes. — F. N. Williams. 
Euphrasia nemorosa, H. Mart. Saltby, Leicester, v.-c. 55, 
Aug. 27, 1909. Oolitic soil, differing in habit from the plant of 
clayey ground. Doubtless a form due to difference of soil and 
habitat. — A. R. Horwood. Correct, I believe ; though some of 
the specimens have the upright branching of E. stricia, Host. — 
E. S. Marshall. All E. neuiorosa I believe, but badly grown 
specimens. — C. Bucknall, Not different from type. — F. N. 
Williams. 
Euphrasia ? Landudno, Carnarvon, v.-c. 49, Sept., 1909. 
— W. G. Travis. Very much like a plant named by Townsend 
Euphrasia curia, var. glahrescens, Watts., from a similar locality. 
It seems to me, however, to approach E. borealis, Towns. — C. 
Bucknai.l. Material very indifferent ; but I have little doubt that 
it is E. ctcria, Wettst., var. glahrescens, Wettst. — E. S. Marshall. 
The material insufficient to express an opinion upon. — F. N. 
Williams. 
Bartsia Odontites, Huds., var. serotina, Dum. Pasture, Lower 
Morden, Surrey, v.-c. 17, Sept. 2, 1909. — C. E. Britton. I believe 
that this is rightly named ; although the calyx-teeth are not 
“narrowed below,” which they should be in Odontites serotina, 
Dum., according to ‘Bab. Man.,’ ed. 9. — Edward S. Marshall. 
Correct. — F. N. Williams, 
Rhinanthus sienophyllus, Schur. On the top of a remote 
grassy down, Bourton Downs, E. Glos., v.-c. 33, July 17, 1909. — 
H. J. Riddelsdell. Yes. In the south of England, June and 
July are its usual months for flowering. — E. S. Marshall. Yes. — 
G. C. Druce. 
Melampyrum pra tense, L., var. purpureum, C. J. Hartm, ? 
Damp, sandy, turfy ground over granite below the crags at the head 
of Glen Eunach, at 2,400 ft. Also slope of Geal-charn, Glen 
Eeshie, at 2,200 ft., v.-c. 96, Easterness, July, 1909. The dried 
specimens unfortunately give but a very imperfect impression of the 
fresh plant. This has a peculiarly neat, erect and compact, rigid 
habit, and the flowers which are tipped with a rich purple or magenta, 
give it a striking and beautiful appearance. These characters are 
however less marked in the plant from Glen Eeshie, which may 
perhaps be accounted for by the locality there being less alpine and 
the aspect less bleak. — J. A. Wheldon and A. Wilson. This is 
