REPORT FOR 1910. 
541 
? Brassica , Port Talbot Docks, v.-c. 41, July 31, 1910. 
This plant is quite strange to me, and looks more like a Raphanus 
than a Brassica ; though I took it at first for Brassica alba with 
glabrous fruit. — H. J. Riddelsdell. I should call this a glaucous 
form of Sinapts dissecta, Lagasca ; almost all my herbarium speci- 
mens are hispid. — C. Bailey. 
Diplotaxis tenuifolia^ DC. Ballast mounds, Witton Brook, 
Northwich, v.-c. 58, August 1910. — W. Hodge. 
Diplotaxis muralis, var. Babingtonii, Syme. Sand hills, Rhyl, 
v.-c. 51, August 1910. — W. Hodge. — No; the so-called variety is 
said to be biennial, and is a much larger plant ; I consider it un- 
worthy of distinction. — Edward S. Marshall. Not Babingtonii, 
but the annual (typical) form. — G. C. Druce. Also as a garden 
weed from Rock, W. Cornwall, August 1910. — H. E. Fox. 
Capsella Bursa -pastoris, Med. A dwarf decumbent form. 
Dried-up pond, nr. Coverack, W. Cornwall, July 21, 1910. — H. E. 
Fox. This is, I believe, a small form of C. Bursa-pastoris, var. 
denstfolia (Mott). I distributed a prostrate Shepherd’s Purse from 
Port Meadow, Oxford, through the ‘ Bot. Exch. Club ’ (see ‘ Report,’ 
2 1 1, 1906), but having subsequently grown it from seed I found that 
while the leaf and fruit characters came true, the prostrate habit 
entirely disappeared. — G. Claridge Druce. A reduced state of 
var. cuneata ; which is, I think, the best-marked of Mott’s ‘ varieties,’ 
and may, perhaps, deserve that rank. — Edward S. Marshall. 
Lepidium ruderale, Linn. Sandy ballast mounds, Witton 
Brook, Northwich, v.-c. 58, July 1910. — W. Hodge. 
Lepidium campestre, Br. forma [ref. No. 6201]. Tidmarsh, 
Berks., in a wood recently cleared, July 1910. Reported on by 
Dr. Thellung as the type. The locality is unusual, and it only 
shows how quickly seeds may be blown from neighbouring corn- 
fields. Doubtless with the growth of underwood, the plant will 
soon be crowded out. — G. Claridge Druce. Weak specimens; 
otherwise I see nothing remarkable about them.— Edward S. 
Marshall. This looks an interesting form of campestre, but the 
pods are too young. Silicles much less scaly than usual but possess 
numerous papillae, reminding one of Z. heterophyllum, var. pa- 
pillosum, Dunn. The leaves and style, however, place this plant of 
Mr. Druce’s under campestre. Perhaps further examples, with 
more mature pods, can be obtained. — C. E. Salmon. 
Lepidium heterophyllum, Benth., var. canescens, Gren. and Godr., 
forma dubia, Druce, in ‘Rep. Bot. Exch. Club,’ 10, 1903. Kings- 
thorpe, Northants, May 1910. This is sent in order to clear up some 
