REPORT FOR 19IO. 
557 
Discoed, Monmouth, June 23, 1910. — A. Ley and VV. A. Shool- 
bred. Not i?. stylosa, Desv., which has much broader, very much 
more hairy leaflets, hairy above as well as beneath. It is typical 
R. sysiyla, Bast., though if the flowers were white (which is not 
stated on the labels), it may be the true R. leucochroa of Desvaux. 
It certainly is not the plant of the south-west of England so named 
by Deseglise. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. Dr. Shoolbred informs me that 
by a slip of the pen he wrote stylosa instead of systyla. I believe 
that this was so named on the spot by Mr. Ley. Too young ; the 
flowers are not yet fully expanded, and no style-character is visible. 
Leaflets glabrous above ; on one piece they are thinly pubescent 
beneath, on the other glabrate, excepting the almost villous midrib 
and sparsely hairy principal nerves. Petioles with scattered stalked 
glands. Pedicels short, Avith numerous stalked glands. No stem- 
prickles present. Probably under stylosa ; but differing in several 
respects from Major Wolley-Dod’s description of the type. It 
should be gathered again in more advanced condition. — Edward 
S. Marshall. 
Rosa jactata, Ddseg. Wadenhoe, Northants, August 3, 1910. 
“ Looks to me more like R. ramealis, Pugst ; though the petioles 
are anything but unarmed.” Major Wolley-Dod. — Augustin 
Ley. I think correct, though usually larger. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. 
A form of R. dumetoru?n, Thuill., with thinly hairy styles and occa- 
sional glands on the teeth. — W. Barclay. 
Rosa ramealis. Pug.? Wadenhoe, Northants, July 1910. — 
Augustin Ley. Not R. ramealis^ Pug., which has a decidedly 
obovoid-elongate fruit. This comes near R. semiglabra, Rip., differ- 
ing mainly in its globose fruit, and may be placed, I think, to 
R. globata, Des^gl., though that species has not yet been recorded 
from Britain.— A. H. Wolley-Dod. There are three specimens 
here, two in fruit and one a leafy shoot. One of the fruiting 
specimens belongs to R. Deseglisei, Bor., the other two seem to 
belong to a simple variation of R. dumetoruvi, Thuill., with rather 
longish acuminate leaflets. — W. Barclay. 
Rosa . Near Wadenhoe, Northants, &c., August 1910.— 
Augustin Ley. Falls under the sub-group Dcseglisei, and is be- 
tween that species and R. incerta, Desegl. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. 
R. Dcsi'^lisei, Bor. Mr. Ley has not numbered his specimens, 
so I cannot make a distinction in the Report between specimens 
gathered in the same station. In this case, however, the label is 
marked 588, indicating R. tomentosa, while the last {R. Deseglisei) 
was marked 598, i.e., R. dumetorum. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. No. 
c88 Specimen too poor to hazard an opinion. — W. Barclay. 
No 598 A form of R. tomentella, Lem., with subfoliar glands 
