210 
ZOOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
Neocarenum (?) mastersi, Mt. Barker, W. Austr., and rugulosum, Salt Lake, 
S. Austr., W. McL., 1. c. p. 68. 
Caremdium damelii^ W. McL. c, p. 69, Cape Yorkj C. kreuslercBj W. 
McL. 1. c. p. 70, S. Australia. 
Scarapkites mastersi, W. McL. ibid., Mt. Barker, W. Australia. 
Schizogenius costiceps, Steinheil, Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. xii. p. 242, S. Luis. 
Panagcaides. 
Crotch (Col. Ilefte, v. p. 109) notes that Panagceus hipustidatus must be 
referred to Fab. and not to Oliv. 
Chaudoir (Rev. et Mag. Zool. 1869, p. 116) thinks Panagceus versidus 
(Lap.) probably erroneously attributed to Senegal, and in that case identical 
with P. cereus (McL.), from Java. The author indicates a new genus, under 
the name Epigraphus^ founded on Isotarsus amplieollis (Sch.) — which ho now 
thinks distinct horn pretiosus^ sibi— and Crasped. arcuaticollis (Murray). The 
characters mentioned are the moderate dilatation of four first joints of ant. 
tarsi in S > which are also clothed with a dense pile beneath, and have the 
fourth joint only slightly notched. C. symei (Murr.) = var. j C. australis 
(Casteln. nec 'DQ].) = comptus (Laf.), Dejean’s australis being represented by 
rockhamptonensis or elongatus (Casteln.). Panagceus strachani (Hope) and 
w^stermanni (Laf.) are considered identical by the author, who considers 
Hope’s description insufficient. 
Castelnau (Trans. Roy. Soc. Viet. viii. p. 146) considers his Brazilian 
genus Dorcylus improperly removed from the Panageeides to the Chlccniidos 
by Lacordaire j he also (with reason) demui-s to Lacordaire’s neglect of his 
prior Eudema for Hope’s Craspedophorus. He enumerates and briefly cha- 
racterizes the known species of Eudema. 
PuTZEYS (Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. xii. C. r. p. lix) notes a var. of Panagceus 
quadripustulatus (Sturm) equivalent to the var. trimaculatus (Dej.) of crux- 
major, and taken by Colbeau near Louvain. 
Epicosmus. Chaudoir, Rev. et Mag. Zool. 1869, describes the following 
new species •* — E. suhlcevis, 1. c. p. 67, Cambodia ; humeratus, p. 69, Cochin 
China; mouhotii, ibid., Laos; laticollis, p. 114 (no locality); soimf/erw, ibid., 
Laos; basifasciatus, p. 116, Laos; pradieri, ibid., Gaboon. 
Euschizome^'us ceneipennis, Malasia, and E. ceneus, Deccan, Chaudoir, 1. c, 
p. 118. 
Chlaniides. 
Fairmaire, Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. 4® sdr. ix. p. 182, changes the name of his 
genus Oodidius into Oodimorphus, on account of the prior Carabideous genus 
Ooidius of Chaudoir. 
Crotch (Coleopt. Hefte, v. p. 109) makes the following observations : — 
Olivier did not describe any (^Chlcenius) fcdlax\ C. festivus to be referred to 
Panz., nec Fab.; C. holosericeus (Fab., VIS7) — tristis (SchalL, 1783); C. 
schranki (Dult.) =nitidulus (Schr., 1781) ; Licinus silphoides (Fab. Ent. Syst. 
nec Rossi) requires renaming ; Badister hipustulatus (Fab. Ent. Syst.) cannot 
stand, microcephalus (Steph.) is suggested for it; B. crux-minor to be re- 
ferred to Fab. nec Oliy. 
Chlcenius palcestinus ^dimidiatus (Chaud.) : Chaudoir, L’Abeille, 
vi. p. 160. 
