36G 
ZOOLOGICAL LITEllATUHl!]. 
For further remarks on tliis species, and its claim to be considered distinct 
from T. cerisyij see Staudinger & Deyrolle in Nos. 5 & 6 of the same journal. 
Pierides. 
Hewitson (Equat. Lep. pp. 2-4) remarks on the species of this family 
collected by Buckley in Ecuador, and gives a full list of the species of 
Leptalis obtained. 
Hopffeb (Stettin, entom. Zeitung, 1869) thinks that Leptalis nasua, Feld. 
( $ = kadeni, Feld.), may be a var. of L. lewyi^ Luc. [=, according to R. 
Felder in litt.]. HopfFeralso (p. 432) considers that Pieris euthemia, Feld., is 
the same as P. stamnata, Luc. j P. leptis, Feld. =P. paulina, Boisd. nee Cram. 
He thinks (p. 434) that Idmais fatma, Feld., is an aberration ofZ eriSf Klug. 
lie also (/. c. p. 432) refers Anthopsyche theopompe^ Feld., to eupompe, King, 
as a variety, and describes the variation of this insect. A. heuylini, Feld., is 
apparently the same as evagore^ Kl. (/. c. p. 433). He further states c. 
pp. 434, 436) that Boisduval has described the males of two species as the 
sexes of his Terias mexicana. 
Boisduval’s T. mexicana^ damaris, Feld., <5. T. leinnia, Feld., is 
probably a var. of T. jucunda^ Boisd. (/. c. p. 435). 
Herrich-Schaffeii (Stettin, entom. Zeitung, 1869) describes specimens 
of Elodina pallene and parthia from Rockhampton (p. 76). Ho also (1. c. 
p. 76) describes Pieris teutonia^ and describes and figures P. cormea (/. c. pi. 1. 
f. 3), P. athama (pi. 1. f. 2), and P. periclea (pi. 1. f. 4), and remarks that 
Hewitson considers the last species to be identical with P. perimaU. He 
also describes Callidryas goryophone and Jlorella, and remarks on Terias 
drona and T. hecahe (/. c. p. 77). He refigures P periclea^ P. athama, and 
P. coronea, Sammlung aussereurop. Schmett. ii. f. 103-105. 
Packard (Guide to Study of Insects, p. 249, fig. 182) notices the trans- 
formations of Pieris oleracea, Harr., and figures the larva and imago. Ho 
also (1. c. p. 250) quotes Saunders’s account of the transformations of Colias 
philodice. 
Leucophasia sinapis. Butler remarks on the habits of this species in Swit- 
zerland. Proc. Ent. Soc. Lond. 1869, p. 8. 
L. lathyri, Dup. nec Hiibn. Bellier de la Chavignerie publishes some notes 
on thisr species, which he considers perfectly distinct in habits, localities, 
flight, and times of appearance from L. sinapis. He characterizes the second 
brood as var. cestivalis. He believes that the true L. lathyri is confined to 
the neighbourhoods of Digue and Aix in Provence. Ann. Soc. Entom. Fr. 
1869, pp. 612, 613. 
Beiir mentions his having found the larva of a true Pieris in South 
Australia on a species of Lorantlms. Trans. Amor. Ent. Soc. ii. p. 303. 
Pieris plexaris, Don. = P. discors, Gmel., according to Kirby, Trans. Ent, 
Soc. Lond. 1869, p. 357. 
P. rap(S. Stefanelli describes a new variety under the name of leucotei^a. 
Bull. Soc. Ent. Ital. i. p. 147. 
P. hrassiccB and rap^. J. M. Bramwell records the occurrence of black 
specimens near Perth. Entomologist, iv. p. 268. 
P. napi, var. bryonies, has occurred near Plymouth (1) according to J. Gat- 
combe. Entom. iv. p. 301. 
Pontia oleracea. Scudder reprints Harris’s original description of this 
