LEPIDOPTERA. 
A 
371 
zanoaj p. 41 j M. mehida and M. zikla, p. 42 j M. ozora and M. loruhama^ p. 43 ; 
and M. rcha^ p. 44. 
Mcsosemia asa, Ilew, Trans. Ent. Soc. Loud. 1809, p. 35, Nicaragua, M, 
jczicla, Butler, Cistula Entomologica, i. p. 11, M. isshia, Butl. /. c., M. thy- 
metina, Butl. 1 . c. p. 12, all from Bogota. 
Crernna calitra, Hewitson, Equat. Lep. p. 45, Ecuador. 
Limnas acroleuca, 11. Felder, Verb, zool.-bot. Ges. in Wien, 1809, p. 407, 
Mexico. 
Xenandra heliodes, Ilopfier, Stettin, entom. Zeitung, 1809, p. 444, Brazil. 
Lycmnides. 
Herrich-Schaffer (Corresp.-Blatt. zool.-min. Ver. Regensb. 
18G8, pp. 13.2-138, 172-176) continues his Prodromus through 
this family, as far as Hewitson has yet treated of it in his 111. 
Diurn. Lep., and discusses the synonymy of the genera. 
Hewitson (111. Diurn. Lep. part 4, Suppl.) figures or remarks on various 
known species of Lrjcamida: ns follows : — Myrina ciniata, Ilew. p. 0, pi. 3. 
f. 84, var. Dqysas tvestermanni,'FQ\^., —Myrina jangala^ Mfir. (p. 8); lolaus 
eurisus, 5 , Cram. pi. 4. f. 31, 32j I. ismts, c?, Hew. p. 10, pi. 4. f. 35, 30 ; 7. 
cii>pus, Fabr. p. 11, pi. 4. f. 39, 40 ; Aphnceus manno7’eus, Butl., prob. = I. 
boivkeri, Trim., var. (p. 11), Dipsas eph’us, Feld., Iras priority Deudorix 
despccna, Hew. (p. 12). IIijpolyc<xna rahe, Boisd. pi. 5. f. 30, 31 j 77. dictcea^ 
Feld., = 77. phorhaSf 5)Hew. (p. 15). Dipsas taxila, Brem., is described 
(p. 16), and figures of this insect and of D. grunus are referred to on pi. 0 
(ined.). 
The following known species of this family are noticed by Saunders, in 
Packard’s Guide to the Study of Insects : — Chrysophanus tlioe^ Westw., eggs 
described p. 264, imago figured p. 357. fig. 209 ; Theda acadica^ Harr., larva 
and pupa described pp. 205-260 ; T. mopsus, transformations described pp. 
266-207 ; T. strigosa, larva and pupa described pp. 267-268 ; Theda ?, 
larva and pupa described pp. 268-269. 
ScuDDER (Harris Correspondence, p. 275) publishes Harris’s description of 
the larva of Tohjommatus cotmjjitas, and (pp. 164, 165) notes by Doubleday 
and Harris on the differences between P. pseudai'giolus, Boisd., Lee., and P. 
dcntargiolus, Harr. MSS. { — neglecta^ Edw.). He also (p. 143) publishes a 
letter of E. Doubleday’s, asking whether Theda hyperici and T, falacer of 
Boisduval are not the same as Drury’s ads and pan, and stating that Tolyom- 
matus \Chrysophanus^ epixa^ithe, Boisd., is only a var. of phlaas, but that 
phlceas, Harr. D’Urb.], is distinct. Pie also publishes (/. c. p. 145) 
a note on the larva of Pol. {Chr.) torquinim, copied by Doubleday from 
Abbot’s MSS. 
W. Saunders (Canad. Entom. i.) describes the larvae of the following 
American Tjycamidce : — rolyommaUis amcricatia, p. 3 ; Theda acadica, p. 95 ; 
2'heda ?, p. 95 ; T. tnopsus, p. 96 ; T. calaims ?, p. 98 ; T. sUigosa, p. 99 ; 
Lyccena neglccta, p. 100. 
He also describes Lyccena pejnhina, 1. c. p. 12. He also (1. c. p. 57) describes 
the eggs of Pol. thacj P. epixanthe^ and Th. inorata, 
Boisduval (Ann. Soc. Ent. Beige, xii.) describes Theda spinciorum, Hew., 
