372 
ZOOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
p. 42 j T. ffrutuiSj Boisd., p. 43 j and Polyommatus xanthoides, Boisd. He 
states that his Lyccena antcegon^L. acmon, Doubl., Hew. 
Amhhjpodia. Hewitson (111. Diurn. Lep. part. 4, pp. 14 a-14 h) makes the 
following corrections in the synonymy of this genus : — A. araxes, Feld., = -4. 
amanteSy var., Hew. j A. aquis, Feld., = ^. anarte $, Hew.; A. tyranuus, 
Feld.,=4[. herculesy var., Hew. ; A. philander y Feld., =.4. micahy Ilombr., 
var. ; A. Feld.,=4. absensy Hew. 
De l'Oiiza (L(5pid. Japonais) describes Theda {Dpsas) lutea (p. 19) and 
T. (I).) scepe&triatay both of Hewitson. 
Hopffer (Stettin, entom. Zeit. 1869, p. 439) points out the differences 
between Pseudolyccena bathildisy Feld., and P. battuSy Cram. He thinks that 
P. spuriusy PQ\<X.y-=zdolylaSy Cr. (p. 440). 
Theda. Edwards (Butt. N. Amer.) figures the following known species of 
this genus: — T. Icetay Theclay pi. 1. f. 1-4 ; T. acadicayl, c. f. 6-7 ; T. ontarioy 
Thecluy pi. 2. f. 1, 2 ; T. strigosay 1. c. f. 3-6. 
Hewitson figures (111. Diurn. Lepid. part 4) T.pholeus, Cram. pi. 50. f. 254 j 
T. celiday Luc. pi. 49. f. 246, 247 ; T. vesidusy Cram. pi. 54. f. 310. 
ScuDDER describes the male of Theda dothildey Edw. Proc. Bost. Soc. 
Nat. Hist. xi. p. 377. 
C. G. Barrett and W. Buckler publish notes on the earlier stages of 
Theda rubi. Ent. M. Mag. vi. pp. 37-39. 
Lyccena. Herrich-Schaffer (Stettin, entom. Zoitung, 1869, pp. 72-75) 
describes and remarks on the following known species of this genus : — L. noray 
L. onychuy L. pahnyray L. perusiay L. archias (P), L. isophthalma, L. eiinusy 
pi. 4. f. 19. He also figures (/, c. f. 18) the female of L. cneius. He refigures 
the last two species, Samml. aussereurop. Schmett. ii. f. 121, 122. 
Edwards (Butt. N. Amer. Lyccena, pi. 1) figures L. violaeea, Edw. f. 1-4) 
and L. lygdamus, Doubl. (f, 5-7). 
Lederer describes and figures a variety of Lyccena panagcea under the 
name of armcia, from Astrabad. Ilor, Soc. Entom. Hoss. vi. p. 78, pi. 4. f. (5, 7. 
He remarks (/. c. pp. 79, 80) on L. eurypilm, Frey., and X. zephyrm, Friv., 
which ho considers to be vars. of L. argus. He considers (/. c. pp. 81, 82) L. 
actisy 11. -S., L. damoncy Ev., L. iphigeniay Fr., L. cannon, ll.-S., and L. 
poseidon. Led., to be aU vars. of L. damon, and figures a female var. of L. 
damone from Astrabad (pi. 4. f. 8). 
Milliere describes the transformations of Lycctna hylas, var. panoptes, 
and figures it in all its stages. Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon, xvi. p. 1, pi. 65. 
f. 1-3. 
Buckler describes the transformations of Lyccena cegon. Ent. M. Mag. 
V. pp. 241-244. 
Zeller argues against Wallepgren’s identification of L. cegon with argus, 
Linn. Stett. entom. Zeitung, 1869, p. 380. 
A. Wilson and Prof. Zeller publish notes on Lyccena medon and arta- 
xerxes. Ent. M. Mag. vi. pp. 62-64. 
Stefanelli describes a variety of Lyccena corijdon under the name of 
apennina. He doubts if it is the variety called apenninus by Zeller. Bull. 
Soc. Entom. Ital. i. p. 169. 
Bond notices some curious varieties of Polyommatus adonis. Proc. Ent. 
Soc. liond. 1868, p. 42. 
E. Demdski describes the larva of Lyccena arion. Ent. M. Mag. vi. p. 62. 
