TRICHOPTERA. 
Ins, 203 
viz,, Chimarrha, Rhyacophila^ Agupetus, and allies, and Bercua and allies; 
but the author expresses an opinion that the last should probably be 
transferred to the LeptoceridcB. The changes in nomenclatnre, and the 
synonymy, cannot be fully detailed here. Details for each species are 
figured as usual. 
Muller, Fritz. Ueber Phryganiden. Zool. Anz. ii. pp. 38-40, 180-182> 
283 & 284, & 406-407. 
Of these four notices on Brazilian species, the first (pp. 38-40) concerns 
the habits, and especially the cases and structure, of the larvas of 30 
species, observed by the author at Blumenau, Santa Oatharina ; some new 
genera are indicated ; the families Phryganeidm and himnophilidm do not 
occur in Brazil. The second (pp. 180-182) explains the structure and habits 
of certain larvae, &c., of Helicopsyche^ and their cases \cf. also P. E. Soc. 
1879, pp. vi. & vii.j. The third (pp. 283 & 284) notices the occurrence of 
branchiae in the imago of a species of Leptoceridce [cf. also P. B. Soc. 
1879, pp. xiii. & xiv., with remarks by McLachlan on the European 
genera of Trichoptera in which such a structure is known to occur] ; and 
the author divides the Trichoptera into two groups, according to the con- 
dition of the pupae : in the first group, comprising Rliyacophilidoi and 
IlydroptilidcB, the pupa is enclosed in a cocoon, lying within the case or 
attached to its inner walls ; in the second, which includes all the other 
families, the case has an opening at each end, allowing a stream of water 
to flow round the strongly active pupa.- The fourth notice (pp. 405-407) 
enlarges on the same subject, with a scheme of classification according to 
the habits of the larvoe in correlation with the structure of the palpi of 
the imago. \_Cf. also Kosmos, ii. pp. 386-396.] 
— — . Notes on the cases of some South Brazilian Trichoptera. Tr. E. 
Soc. 1879, pp. 131-144. 
Embodies much of the matter appearing in the above-mentioned notes, 
with additional new genera, and fuller descriptions of those previously 
proposed. (All these observations are anticipatory of a more extended 
paper that will appear, with plates, in the Arch. Mus. R. Jan.) 
Rostock, M. Einige Bermerkungen fiber die Arbeit von Walleugren, 
die Linneischen Arten der Gattung Phryganea betreffend. SB. Ges. 
Isis, 1879, pp. 68-70. 
A sketch of Wallengren’s views, and McLachlan’s objections thereto 
[vide infrd\ 
Wallengren, H. D. J. An Analysis of the Species of Caddis- Flies 
{Phryganea) described by LinnoBus in his “Fauna Suecica.” J. L. S. 
xiv. pp. 726-733. Followed by Notes by R. McLachlan, pp. 
733-736. 
The following changes are suggested by Wallengren : — Ph. striata — 
Neuronia rujicrus, Scop. ; Ph. grisea = Limnophilus stigma, Curt. ; Ph. 
bimaculata = Limnophilus griseus, auctt. ; Ph. flavilatera = Hydropsyche 
instabilis, Curt. P ; Ph. saltatrix = Stenopsocus immaculatus, Steph. Ho 
also thinks that Tinea robertella, L., = Leptocerus dissimilis, Steph. ; the 
Linnean names having priority in all cases. The Recorder, 1. c., has 
1879. [voL. XVI.] c 14 
