17,2 Morrison: Philippine Noncliaspine Coccidse 157 
I have also seen specimens that are almost certainly this species 
from Java, where they were collected by Mr. P. van der Goot. 
Genus DROSICHA Walker 
The genus as recognized in this paper is sufficiently character- 
ized in the key to genera to be recognizable. It is in all proba- 
bility synonymous with Monophlebus Burm. as the latter genus 
is understood by E. E. Green and some other writers. One 
species has been collected in the Philippines. 
Drosicha townsendi (Ckll.). Plate 1, fig. 3. 
Monophlebulus toivnsendi Cockerell, Proc. Dav. Acad. Sci. 10 (1905) 
127 (2); Robinson, Philip. Journ. Sci. § D 12 (1917) 4. 
Drosicha lichenoides Cockerell, Journ. Econ. Ent. 6 (1913) 142 (2) ; 
Robinson, Philip. Journ. Sci. § D 12 (1917) 4. 
Llaveia benguetensis Cockerell, Journ. Econ. Ent. 9 (1916) 235 (c?) ; 
Robinson, Philip. Journ. Sci. § D 12 (1917) 5. 
I have been especially fortunate in having available for ex- 
amination the type material of both of the females listed above. 
A study of M. townsendi, the type material of which consists of 
a single specimen, shows clearly that at least one, and in all prob- 
ability two, of the terminal segments of both antennae are broken 
off, thus giving the impression that they are 6-segmented. A 
careful comparison with the type material of D. lichenoides 
shows that these two are the same. Neither of these females, as 
described by Cockerell, seems to be fully mature nor as large as 
the species becomes, in spite of the fact that Cockerell describes 
the eggs in his original description of the latter species. There 
does seem, however, to be a wide range in size of the adult female 
at the time of oviposition, and this may account for the fact that 
most of the adult females examined by me were larger than 
Cockerell’s specimens. Through the collections of Mr. Geo. Com- 
pere in Manila it has been possible to examine a large quantity 
of material of this species, and to determine the synonymy of 
the male included above by a comparison of the males collected 
with the females by Compere, with Cockerell’s description of 
Llaveia benguetensis. 
In addition to the records given by Miss Robinson under the 
three different names, I have examined a large number of spec- 
imens as follows: 
Luzon, Manila, on unnamed plant host, 1909 (coll. Compere 
15057), on various plants, 1911 (coll. Compere 21038), on En- 
terolobium saman (coll. Banks 99U3) , on Cassia (coll. H. S. 
Smith), on Hibiscus (coll. Arce 2567) : Laguna Province, Los 
