170 The Philippine Journal of Science 1921 
hau stive experiments have been carried on with a planting 
exclusively of such a slightly susceptible host. 
6. In a district or region in which the extremely suscep- 
tible varieties such as the limes and grapefruits constitute the 
important, commercial orchards, either complete eradication of 
the affected host plants or substitution of less susceptible hosts 
is apparently the only means of preventing severe losses from 
this disease. From the results presented in this paper such 
is not the case, however, with the less susceptible species. 
LITERATURE CITED 
1. Bedford, Duke of, and Pickering, S. U. Bordeaux mixture. 8th 
Rept. Woburn Exp. Fruit Farm (1908). 
2. Idem. Copper Fungicides. 11th Rept. Woburn Exp. Fruit Farm 
(1910). 
3. Bourcart, E. Insecticides, fungicides and weedkillers. Translated 
from the French by Donald Grant. Scott, Greenwood and Son, Lon- 
don (1913) 282-284. 
4. Coronas, Jose. The climate and weather of the Philippines, 1903 to 
1918. Bureau of Printing, Manila, Weather Bureau Pub. (1920) 195. 
5. Doidge, Ethel M. The origin and cause of citrus canker in South 
Africa. Union of S. Africa Dept, of Agr. Science Bull. 8 (1916) 17. 
6. Doryland, E. D. Citrus canker investigations at the Singalong Ex- 
periment Station. Philip. Agr. Rev. 9 (1916) 133—135. 
7. Idem. Effects of formalin-Bordeaux mixture on citrus canker. Philip. 
Agr. Rev. 10 (1917) 51-54. 
8. Kellerman, K. F. Cooperative work for eradicating citrus canker. 
Yearbook U. S. Dept. Agr. (1916) 270. 
9. Lee, Atherton. Further data on the citrus canker affection of the 
citrus species and varieties at Lamao. Philip. Agr. Rev. 11 (1918) 
200-206. 
10. Idem. The behaviour of the citrus canker organism in the soil. Journ. 
Agr. Res. 19 (1920) 189. 
11. Idem. Action of some fungicides on the citrus canker organism. Philip. 
Journ. Sci. 17 (1920) 325. 
12. Idem. The increase in resistance to citrus canker with the advance 
in the maturity of citrus trees. Phytopathology 11 (1921) 70. 
13. Lutman, B. F. The covering power of the precipitation membranes 
of Bordeaux mixture. Phytopathology 2 (1912) 32. 
14. Mackie, D. B. Observations on the distribution of citrus canker. 
Philip. Agr. Rev. 9 (1916) 278. 
15. Merrill, E. D. An Interpretation of Rumphius’s Herbarium Amboi- 
nense. Bureau of Printing, Manila, Bur. Sci. Pub. 9 (1917) 296. 
16. Stevens, H. E. Citrus canker, II. Bull. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. 124 
(1914) 42. 
17. Idem. Citrus canker, III. Bull. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. 128 (1914) 19. 
