ADDITIONAL IDENTIFICATIONS. 
433 
LEGUMINOSiE (p. 37). 
Cylista piscatoria Blanco, eel. 1, 589; Galactia ? terminiflora Blanco ed. 2, 
411, previously considered by the author to be a distinct species of Millettia, 
M. piscatoria (Blanco) Merr. is certainly identical with Derris elliptica (Wall.) 
Benth., a species widely distributed from Martaban to the Malayan Peninsula 
and Archipelago. (See Merrill in Philip. Journ. Sci. 1 (1906) Suppl. 66.) 
Cytisus quinquepetalus Blanco ed. 1, 598; ed. 2, 581. Following F.-Villar 
this was considered to be the same as Desmodium cephalotes Wall., but on securing 
specimens it was found to be quite distinct from Wallich’s species and to represent 
a distinct species of Desmodium, D. quinquepetalum (Blanco) Merr. in- Govt. 
Lab. Publ. 35 (1905) 20. 
Negretia mitis Blanco ed. 1, 588; ed. 2, 410, non Beauv., has been considered 
by the author as Mucuna lyonii Merr. in Philip. Journ. Sci. 1 (1906) Suppl. 
197. However the validity of the latter species seems doubtful, and it may prove 
only a form of Mucuna nivea DC., to which Blanco’s species was reduced by 
F.-Villar. 
Mimosa membranulacea Blanco ed. 1, 739; Reichardia pentapeiala Blanco, 
ed. 2, 233. This was considered to be the same as Pterolobium indicum A. Rich., 
after F.-Villar, but was later considered by the author to represent a distinct 
species. Pterolobium membranulaceum (Blanco) Merr., in Govt. Lab. Publ. 35 
(1905) 22, where the species is redeseribed. 
Bauhinia grandiflora Blanco, ed. 1, 332; ed. 2, 231, non Juss. This is 
apparently identical with Bauhinia acuminata Linn., and not at all B. variegata 
Linn., to which F.-Villar reduced it. B. acuminata Linn., seems to be widely 
distributed in Luzon but is nowhere abundant. 
MYRTACEA3 (p. 45). 
Metrosideros pictapetala Blanco, ed. 2, 295. This species was described by 
Blanco in the first edition under the name Legn otis lanceolata, p. 445, as pointed 
out to me by Dr. C. B. Robinson in lit. F.-Villar failed to connect Legnotis of 
the first edition with Metrosideros of the second edition, and made no attempt 
to reduce the former. I have as yet not succeeded in connecting Blanco’s species 
with any known one. 
Eugenia lobas Blanco ed. 1, 857; Eugenia cauliflora Blanco ed. 2, 291. 
Considered by the author to represent a distinct species and redescribed under the 
former name in Govt. Lab. Publ. 35 (1905) 48. 
ONAGRACEiE (p. 48). 
Balingayum is excluded from this family and referred to Galogyne ( Goode - 
niacece) which see (p. 434). 
ARALIACE.E (p. 51). 
Nauclea digitata Blanco, ed. 2, 102= Schefflera blancoi Merr. in Philip. Journ. 
Sci. 1 (1906) Suppl. 109. 
