SPECIAL WORK. 
Mamm. 47 
is the author’s S. celebensis , v. pliilippensis (S. philippensis of Meyer), 
while that from Palawan, between Mindoro and Borneo, is his S. bar- 
batus , y. palavensis. 
Incertj: Ordinis. 
Procynictis, n. g., V. Lemoine, Bull. Soc. Geol. (3) xix, p. 270, Low. 
Eocene, Rheims. 
f Protoproviverra palcconictides, n. g. & sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 272, ibid. 
Arctocyanides, n. g., Lemoine, t. c. p. 275, ibid. 
I f Conaspklotherium, n. g., Lemoine, l. c., ibid. 
* f Plesiesthonyx munieri , n. g. & sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 276, ibid. 
f Adapisoriculus minimus, n. sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 277, ibid. 
J + Pro toadapis curvicuspidens , n. g. & sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 284, ibid. 
f Protoadapis recticuspidens, n. sp., Lemoine, l. c., ibid, 
d -\ Lophiodochocrus peroni , n. g. & sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 287, ibid. 
\ Froiodichobune oweni , n. g. & sp., Lemoine, t. c. p. 288, ibid. 
/f Prctodichobune lydehkeri , n. sp., Lemoine, l. c., ibid. 
7 . CETACEA. 
Jouan, H. Apparition des Cetaces sur les C6tes de France. Bull. Soc. 
L. Norm. (4) v, pp. 137-164. 
A record of all the occurrences of the various Cetaceans on the French 
coasts. 
Southwell, T. W. Zool. (3)xv, pp. 121-126, has notes on the Whale 
fishery of 1890. 
Zietz, A. A List of South Australian Whales and Dolphins. Tr. R. 
Soc. S. Austr. xiii, pp. 8 & 9 (1890). 
7 species are recorded, among which is Neobalcena. marginata , of which 
entire specimens have recently been obtained, 
A. — MYSTACOCETI. 
a. Bal/enid#:. 
-j -Balama pampcea , n. sp., F. Ameghino, Rev. Arg. Hist. Nat. i, pp. 166 
& 167, Pleistocene, Bahia Blanca. 
4j- Notiocetus romerianus, n. g. & sp., Ameghino, t. c. p. 167, ibid. 
\Notiocetu8 platensis, n. sp., Ameghino, t. c. p. 255, Tertiary, La Plata, 
Balamoptera musculus. W. Crouch, Tr. Ess. Club, v, pp. 124-128, 
pi. iv, records and figures a female caught near Burnham in the river 
Crouch on Feb. 12. Length, 46 ft. 6 in. 
E. D. Cope, P. Ac. Philad. 1891, pp. 474-478, describes a Balcenoptera 
stranded on the coast of New Jersey, which he considers may be a dis- 
tinct species from B. musculus , and if so may perhaps be the same as 
Gray’s B. duguidii. 
