THEORY OF EVOLUTION. 
Gen. Sub. 7 
*Aveling, E. Die Darwinische Theorie. Stuttgart : Dietz, 8vo, 71 pp. 
*Baker, F. Relative Stability of Organs as dependent on Phylogeny. 
Am. Ass. for Adv. of Science, xxxv, 1886. 
# Bunge, G. Yitalismus und Mechanismus. Leipzig : 8vo, -/6, 20 pp. 
Carneri, B. Vergangliches und Bleibeudes im Darwiuismus. Kosmos, 
xviii, pp. 401-415. 
Principally a criticism of Weismann’s and Spitzer’s conclusions. 
. Sedgwick, Wallace, du Prel und die Lehre Darwin’s. Op. cit. 
pp. 321-338. 
Mainly non-zoological. 
# Cattaneo, Gr. Giovanni Lamarck e Carolo Darwin. Milano-Torino. : 
Domolard, 8vo, 36 pp. 
# Cochin, D. L’Evolution et la Vie. Paris : G. Masson. 
Conn, H. W. Evolution of To-day. New York : 8vo, 350 pp. 
* . The Limits of Organic Evolution. Am. Nat. xx, pp. 413-422. 
Cope, E. D. The Origin of the Fittest. Macmillan, 465 pp. 
*Coutance, A. Les Theories de la Yie jug^es dans l’ceuf. Paris : 2/6, 
8vo, 105 pp. 
Cunningham, J. T. Charles Darwin, Naturalist. Edinburgh: Brown, 
8vo, 32 pp. 
*Dall, W. H. Deep-Sea Mollusca. Bull. Mus. C. Z. xii, pp. 171-318, 
9 pis. ; J. R. Micr. Soc. 1887, p. 61r 
Inter alia — “ Natural selection may act as successfully by confining the 
inflexibility of a particular stock, as by seizing the favourable variations 
of the vast majority of living beings which vary indefinitely in all 
directions.” 
<5 Dawson, J. W. The Origin of the World according to Revelation and 
Science. Fourth edition, with corrections and additions. London : 
7/6, 8vo, 450 pp. 
*Dixon, C. Evolution without Natural Selection, or the Segregation of 
Species, &c. (1885.) Critical Review. Ann. N. H. xvii, pp. 
381-384. 
*Duval, M. Le Darwinisme. Paris : Lecrosnier. 
*Gasco, F. Influenza della Biologia sul pensiero moderno. Roma : 
Loescher, 8vo, 57 pp. 
*Gaule, J. Die Stellung des Forschers gegeniiber dem Problem des 
Lebens. Rede. Leipzig : Yert & Co., 8vo. 
Geddes, P. Theory of Growth, Reproduction, Sex, and Heredity. 
P. R. Soc. Edinb. pp. 911-931. 
“ In short, all the modifications of form, floral or other, in one or in 
two generations, must be explained — not in terms of ‘ spontaneous varia- 
tion,’ i.e., by unaccountable variations in each special case, with natural 
selection varying also with circumstances for each special case, as has 
