THEORY OF EVOLUTION. 
Gen, Sub. 9 
*Miciielis, F. Antidarwinismus. Ueber’s Kritik der Weltansicht, Da 
Bois Reymond’s und Sachs’ Yorlesungen iiber Pflanzenphysiologie. 
Zwci stumme Zeugen fiir die Richtigkeit meiuer idealen Wei tauff as- 
sung. Heidelberg : 8vo, 75 pp. 
*Mobius, K. Die Bilduug, Geltung und Bezeichnung der Art-Begriffe 
und ihr Yerhaltniss zur Abstain mu ngslehre. Zool. JB. Bd. i (also 
Jena: Fischer). 
Morris, C. 'Methods of Defence in Organisms. P. Ac. Philad. 1886, 
pp. 25-29; J. R. Micr. Soc. vi. pp. 948 & 949. 
Methods of defence considered in relation to evolution. 
Mosely, H. N. Summary of Weismann. Nature, xxxiii, pp. 629-632. 
# Munsterberg, H. Die Lehre von der natiirlichen Anpassung in ihrer 
Eutwickelung, Anwendung und Bedeutung. Leipzig: 1885, 114 pp. 
*Quatrefages, A. de. Histoire generale des Races Humaines, Questions 
gdudrales. Paris: 8vo, 227 cuts, 4 pis., &c. 
*Renooz, C. Nouvelle th<$orie do Involution basee sur le ddvoloppe- 
ment embryonnaire tel qu’il est. J. Microgr. x, pp.- 135-159. 
Romanes, G. J. Physiological Selection : an additional suggestion on 
the Origin of Species. J. L. S. xix, pp. 337-411 ; abstr. Nature, 
xxxiv, pp. 314-316, 336-340, & 362-365. 
“As a theory of origin of species, natural selection has in its way three 
cardinal difficulties : (1) The difference between species and varieties in 
respect of mutual fertility ; (2) The swamping effects of free intercrossing 
upon an individual variation ; (3) The inutility to species of so large a 
proportion of specific distinctions.” “Natural selection is not, properly 
speaking, a theory of the origin of species ; it is a theory of the origin — 
or rather of the cumulative development — of adaptations 
“ Whenever any variation in the highly variable reproductive system 
occurs, tending to sterility with the parent form, without impairing fer- 
tility with the varietal form, a physiological barrier must interpose, 
dividing the species into two parts, free to develop distinct histories, 
•without mutual intercrossing, or by independent variation.” “ By 
regarding mutually sterile species as records of variation in reproductive 
systems, we are at work, so to speak, on the foundation of the matter.” 
. Physiological Selection ; Nature, xxxiv. Criticisms by Argyll, 
Duke of ; Meldola, R. ; Wallace, A. R., &c. 
— — . Criticism by “ F. J. B.” Athenseum, No. 3069. 
*Sabatier, Arm. Essais d’un naturaliste transformiste sur quelques 
questions actuelles. Alenin : 8vo, 63 pp. 
*Sedgwick, W. Life : the Explanation of it. London : 2/6, 8vo. 
Spencer, Herbert. The Factors of Organic Evolution. Nineteenth 
Century, No. 86 ; Kosmos, xvii, and separately, Williams & Norgate.. 
“ The direct action of the medium was the primordial factor of 
organic evolution. Acting alone, it must have initiated the primary 
