14 
Fucus Dealensis fistulosns, Laryngte similis. Ray’s SyB°P’’ 
vol. I. p. 89.. no. 8. Tnbulous Coralline, wrinkUd like tb® 
windpipe, Ellis’ Corallines, p. 30, no. 1, pi. 16, fig- ' 
Tubularia Mnscoides, Turton’s Lin., vol. 4, p. 667. Stewart 3 
Elem,, vol. 2, p 438. Fleming’s Brit. An., p. 552. Tub® 
laria larynx, Ellis and Solander’s Zooph., p. 31, no. 
Johnston’s Brit. Zooph., p. 115, pi. 3, fig. 3, pi. 4, fig 3, J 
and 5. 
Hub. On shells and stones beyond low water mark, a0> 
on shells from deep water; common; at Talland sand-h 9 ) 1 ’ 
There are two varieties of this species, one branched * D 
the. other not. The branched variety trives off its branch^ 
in a very irregular manner, and generally at an obtuse an? 
with the trunk. This is however liable to considerab 
variation and irregularity. The unbranched variety is 
rally found in clusters, interwoven at the base, and filifo 1 "^' 
This species is distinguished from the last, in dried specimen-’ 
by the tubes being ringed at regular intervals, presenting 11 . 
appearance of the windpipe of a bird ; from which it deri v ‘ 
its name larynx. In a recent state, the rings are visible I 
transmitted light.. The polypes are naked, with two cirm® 
of tentacula. The head is light red, the tentacnla are win ’ 
or white fringed with red. The reproductive gemmules f 1 " 
from the base of the tentacula. 
* * Tubes branched. 
T. RAMOSA. Tube single and regularly branched ; aH et j 
P Fil is 
vol j’ 
nate and ringed ; the polypes with only a single row 
tentacula. 
Small ramified tubular Coralline, Ellis’ Coral., n 
no. 3. pis. 16 and 17, fig. a A. Tubularia Ramosa, 
and Solander’s Zooph., p. 32, no. 3. Turton’s Lin., .. 
p. 666. Stewart’s Elem., vol. 2, p. 437. Fleming’s ^ 
An., p. 662. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. 1, p. 278. Tempi®'" 
in Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. 9, p. 466. Johnston’s Brit. Zoop 
p. 116. 
Hub. From deep water off the Deadman on the 
Ingens, common; and a little beyond low water mark," 
perro; Gorran, Mr. Peach. 
This Species may be distinguished from branched vari® ^ 
of the preceding by the regularity with which the braO c ^j 
arise, in an alternate manner. It appears to be confouP.^y 
with several species, especially with the branched v ° r, - (1 ^ 
of T. Larynx and the following, T. Ramea. In comp 9 !.; 
the two together there will be but little chance of confu® 1 
but otherwise, it may be difficult to distinguish between tb 
