50 
af Legemets Lasngde, naar Snabelen fraregnes, og er navn- 
lig udmserket ved den overordentlig stasrkt forlaengede og 
smale cylimteske Hals. Derimod er Pandedelen her be- 
tydelig mindre, idet den neppe er lialvt saa lang som Hal- 
sen og heller ikke paa langt nser dobbelt saa bred som 
Kroppen paa det tykkeste. Den er soin hos foregaaende 
Art skarpt afmarkeret fra Halsen, noget i'ordybet langs 
den avre Side og liar Sidehj 0 rnern 6 stumpt afrundede. Hale- 
segmentet viser en ligncnde Form som hos foregaaende Art. 
men har Spidsen mere tydeligt indskaaret i Midten. 
0ieknuden er ogsaa lier (se Fig. 2 a) temmelig lav, 
dog noget mere fremspringende end hos don typiske Art 
og stumpt tilspidset i Enden. Lindserne er (se Fig. 2 c) 
s£erdeles store, mesten sammenstodende, og det til enhver 
horende Pigment, synes her at danne en failles central 
Masse. 
Snabelen forholder sig i alt vsesentligt ganske som 
hos foregaaende Art. 
Ogsaa Saxlemmerne er (se Fig. 2 a, 2 b) af en meget 
lignende Bysrning, om de end i Detailerne viser enkelte 
vel udprsegede Differentser. De er idetbele paa langt 
nser ikke saa robuste, som hos den typiske Art, og har 
Skaftet temmelig smalt, cylindriskt og ganske glat. Haan- 
den (Fig. 2 d) er, som hos foregaaende Art, stserkt opsvul- 
met, nsesten kugleformig, men af forholdsvis ringere Stor- 
relse og besat med korte, temmelig ens udviklede Haar. 
Fingrene, der er adskilligt kortere end Palmen, er mindre 
stserkt cbitiniserede, med Spidsen kun meget svagt kruiu- 
met. Paa den ubevsegelige finger Andes ogsaa her et 
pladeformigt Freinspring, men dette har her en ganske glat, 
ikke tandet, Eg, og den tandfonnige Fortsats i Inderkanten 
af derme Finger synes at mangle, eller er ialfald meget 
utydelig. Derimod har den bevsegelige Finger i Midten 
af Inderkanten en tydelig saadan Fortsats. 
De falske Fodder er hos Hannen (se Fig. 2 a) stserkt 
forlsengede og idetbele spinklere end hos foregaaende Art. 
5te Led er ogsaa her det lsengste og har i Enden en lig- 
nende borstebesat Lap; men Forskjellen i Lsengde mellem 
dette og det foregaaende Led er dog her mindre end hos 
den typiske Art. Af Endepartiets Led (Fig. 2 c) er det 
lste nsesten saa langt som de 2 folgende tilsammen og cy- 
lindriskt. Raudtornerne paa de 4 ydre Led (Fig. 2 f) 
stemmer i Bygning user overens med samme hos foregaa- 
ende Art, men synes forholdsvis noget smalere. Endekloen 
er ligeledes tyndere og mere forlsenget end hos denne Art. 
Gangfodderne (se Fig. 2) er, sammenlignede med 
samme hos C. malleolata, saerdeles spinkle og forlsengede, 
nsesten 4 Gauge lsengere end Legemet, og kun sparsomt 
haarbesatte. At Hofteleddene er 2det stserkt forlsenget, 
lasngere end de 2 Ovrige tilsammen; Laarleddet er hos 
Hunnen dobbelt saa langt som Hoftepartiet og noget op- 
svulmet, skjondt mindre end hos foregaaende Art; lste Lseg- 
led er neppe kortere end Laarleddet og 2det do. er 1 / 2 
Gang lsengere og meget smalt. Tarsalleddet (se Fig. 2 g) 
er, som hos foregaaende Art, meget lidet, dog lsengere i 
the length of the body, excepting the proboscis, and is chiefly 
characterized by th a prodigiously elongated and narrow 
cylindrical neck. On the other hand the frontal part is 
considerably smaller, being scarcely half as long as the neck 
and not, by far, twice as broad as the trunk where thickest. 
As in the preceding species, it is sharply marked off from 
the neck, somewhat hollowed along the upper side, and has 
the lateral corners obtusely rounded. The caudal segment 
exhibits a similar form to that of the foregoing species but 
lias the point more distinctly incised in the middle. 
The oculiferous tubercle is also in this animal (see 
fig. 2 a) rather low, projecting, however, somewhat more than 
in the typical species, and has the extremity obtusely 
acuminated. The lenses (see fig. 2 c) are exceedingly large, 
well-nigh contiguous, and the pigment belonging to each 
would seem to constitute here a common central mass. 
The proboscis is in all essential characteristics pre- 
cisely as in the preceding species. 
Also the chelifori (see fig. 2 a, 2 b) exhibit a very 
similar structure, although with certain well-marked minor 
differences. They are, on the whole, by no means so robust 
as in the typical species and have the scape rather nar- 
row, cylindrical, and quite smooth. The hand (fig. 2 d) is, 
as in the preceding species, very much swollen, almost 
globular, but comparatively small in size and beset with 
rather uniformly developed short hairs. The fingers, a good 
deal shorter thau the palm, are less highly chitinised, with 
the point only gently curved. On the immobile finger oc- 
curs, too, in this animal, a lamelliform projection, but with 
a perfectly smooth, not dentated, edge, and the dentiform 
process on the inner edge would seem to be absent or at 
least, is very indistinct. The mobil" finger has, however, 
in the middle of the inner edge, such a process distinctly 
developed. 
The false legs in the male (se ; e fig. 2 a) are very elon- 
gate and, on the whole, more slender than in the preceding 
species. The 5th joint is, also, in the present form the longest, 
and has at the extremity a similar setiferous lobe ; but the 
difference in length between this and the preceding joint 
is, however, less than in the typical species. Of the joints 
composing the terminal part (fig. 2 c), the 1st is well-nigh 
as long as the 2 succeeding ones taken together, and is cv- 
lindric in form. The marginal spines on the 4 outer joints 
(fig. 2 f) correspond in structure, almost quite, with those of 
the preceding species, but would seem to be relatively 
somewhat slenderer. The terminal claw is likewise more 
slender and elongate than in the said form. 
The ambulatory legs (see fig. 2) are, as compared 
with those of C. malleotata, excessively slim and elongated, 
almost 4 times longer than the body, and but sparingly 
beset with hair. Of the coxal joints the 2nd is very elongate, 
its length exceeding that of the 2 others taken together ; the 
femoral joiut in the female is twice as long as the coxal 
part and somewhat tumid, although less so than in the pre- 
ceding species; the 1st tibial joint is hardly shorter than 
the femoral joint, and the 2nd is half as long again and very 
slender. The tarsal joint (see fig. 2 g) is, as in the preceding 
