76 Echin. 
XIV. ECHINODERMA. 
Natal locc. unreliable, many other records incorrect (p. 180), var. 
tenuispina Norman raised to specific rank (p. 180), this not the form 
so named on p. 162; Mortensen (229). E. fasciatus Parfitt may be 
young of any British Echinid (p. 104), E. gracilis distinguished (p. 100, 
pi. xviii), E. horridus , pedicellariae (p. 102, pi. xix), E. lucidus , discussed 
(pp. 100, 177, pi. xix), E. magellanicus , descr., pedicellariae figd., 
specimens recorded from Crozet Is. are not this sp., specimens from 
Prince Edward Id., Australia, and New Zealand also doubted, specimens 
from Patagonia have been wrongly refd. to E. norvegicus (p. 103, pi. xix), 
E. margaritaceus descr., pedicellariae figd., inch Sterechinus antarcticus 
and E. diadema (p. 101, pi. xix) ; Mortensen (229). E. microstoma ; 
Nichols (236) p. 260. E. microtuberculatus ; Albrecht (5a) : Boveri 
(23) : Doncaster (64) : Driesch (70) : Teichmann (303) : Ziegler 
(338) : descr., pedicellariae figd., but the sp. so called is clearly not that 
to which De Blainville gave the name, it may be E. pulchelhis, refd. 
to Parechinus (q. v.) ; Mortensen (229) p. 107, pis. xv, xvi. E. miliaris ; 
Lonnberg (197) p. 25 : Nichols (236) p. 261 : Petch (257) : Simpson 
(294) p. 42 : development ; MacBride (207) p. 294 : descr., pedicellariae 
figd., refd. to Parechinus (q.v.) ; Mortensen (229) p. 107, pi. xvii. E. 
neumayeri , descr., pedicellariae figd. ; Mortensen (229) p. 103, pis. xix, 
xx. E. norvegicus ; Nichols (236) p. 260: Norman (239) p. 410: 
Petersen (259): Simpson (294) p. 42: specimens recorded from 
Patagonia are partly E. magellanicus , partly another sp., specimens 
recorded from Japan are probably E. lucidus ; Mortensen (229) p. 101. 
“iE. cf. pusillus Mimst.” of Oehmke 1887, from Bockup Sandst., 
compared with “ Psammechinus pusillus ” Ebert; Gagel (97) p. 530. 
E. robillardi , descr., pedicellariae figd. (p. 109, pi. xxi), refd. to Gymn- 
echinus (q.v.) (p. 115), E. tenuispinus n. sp., descr. fr. specimens fr. 
Porcupine Bank, 91 fm., in Brit. Mus., but = E. esculentus var. tenui- 
spina Norman (p. 181, fig.); Mortensen (229). E. vewucidatus 
(p. 1101) & t(p. 1102); Fourtau (89): refd. to Psammechinus ; 
Mortensen (229) p. 115. E. wallisi } discussed, remains ‘problematic’ 
(p. 99), either syn. of E. elegans or no Echinus (p. 145) ; Mortensen 
(229). 
iEnallaster y diagnosis (p. 84), E. couloni (p. 87), E. filtoni , referred to 
Toxaster ( Miotoxaster ) by Lambert (p. 91), E. oblongus (p. 86), E. 
renevieri , distinguished from E. fittoniby Lambert (p. 88) ; Savin (283). 
Endocysti (and Exocysti), note by Lambert on etymology; Savin (283) 
p. 72. 
iEocidaris halliana ? ; Girty (104) p. 332. E. cf. hallianus\ Katzer (165) 
p. 163. 
■fEpiaster : — E. brevis ; Wollemann (326) p. 33. E. gibbus ; Jukes- 
Browne (161) p. 94 : Reid (268) p. 56 : large specimens and depressed 
specimens ; Wollemann (326) p. 33 : resembles E. schlueteri ; Lambert 
in Review. E. nutrix n. sp., Upper Senonian of Fanivelona, Mada- 
gascar; Lambert (174) p. 86, pi. iii. 
Eucidaris Pomel, founded for fossil spp. can not in present knowledge be 
applied to recent spp. ; Mortensen (229) p. 19 : s.-g. of Cidaris (q. v.) 
and E. metularia ; Doederlein (62) p. 688. 
t Eupatagus (vel Euspatangus) : — E. coranguinum ; Howchin (149): 
E. jouanneti ; Fallot (78) p. 300. E. maximus ; Falkner & Ludwig 
(77) p. 535. E. murrayensis ; Dennant & Clark (55) p. 42. E. 
ornatus; Mayer-Eymar (217) p. 393. 
Eury echinus Verrill will probably have to be used for Strongylocentrotus 
drobachiensisj purpuratus , and franciscanus ; Mortensen (229) p. 121. 
EvechinuSy syn. of Heliocidaris (p. 116), E. chloroticus , descr., pedicel- 
lariae figd. (p. 115, pi. xix), E. rarituberculatus distinguished fr. E \ 
chloroticuSy pedicellariae figd. (p. 116, pi. xix); Mortensen (229). 
