28 A. P. R. Hoernle — The Weber Manuscripts. [No. 1, 
5, ^ .#[']. 
sapta prakritayo yasya r&shtram cha nirupadravam 52 [ll] 
na [ praki\ 
6, rtitah [l] 
raj&nah kara-da yasya visas=ch=avijayi-kritah 53 [ll] 
Islitiya [ I ] 
7, anitya-manusham 16k^m=s=tu samjate 20 | 54 [ll] 
Nighanda-nigama-pram [ l] 
]" 
Tho obverse of tlio next leaf continues as follows : — 
1, . . -ch-chkatram kshatriyair=Buddka-nirjitaih 55 [ll] 
Eka-ch-clikatram mahim vyamkte [ I 
] 
2, van&d=upavanaih smritam [56 ll] 
Padmini reju rajiva-chatra-pattavati smri[ia |] 
The remainder is almost illegible. 
The leaf that immediately precedes the foregoing two loaves, reads 
as follows : — 
Obverse. 
1, .... shthas=chanda-samjnitam 24 [||] 
Parame-slithi matah sreshthah pre . priya . da [. .1 
' ’ ■] 
2, [&£]rtitam 25 [l|] 
Pada-krich=charmakara syat=tapitas=tu vamo matah [l] 
lavanyam=ahur=madhu [ 26 II 
. . .' ] 
3, . svas& tn bhagini mata | 
vata-pitta-kaph4tmano vyadhayah [ par ikir Utah 27 II 
] 
4, . . tt& hy=upadravah [|] 
ajfio vesah sam&khyato nuttam preritam=uch[i/ate 28 II 
] 
5, . . hutah [|] 
talpam tn sayanam jneyarh kliatv=eti . . tha vaku 2 [.9 || 
• ; a 
6, kilasam panduram jneyam dola prenkh=cti samjnitah 30 [||] 
Barhimsi clia [ I 
] 
20 This verse is blundered ; four syllables are wanting. Perhaps read samjayatS. 
Tho final double dot is not a visarga, but the mark of interpunctuation. 
