25 
1893.] A. F. R. Hoernle — The Weber Manuscripts. 
2, ddhy-arba-dandena parimuchchishyati | yava ,evam=eva 
parimuclich [ ishyati ] 
3, [na] . . sastra[m] kramati na vislia n=agni n=asi-visba na kak- 
kliordda 17 na vaitala na 
4, . . [Sajlain karoti atyattra 18 pnrima-karma-vipikona 1 evam-uktfi 
Bhagavam ma [hard-'] 
5, [jam] ya[&s/ia]-senapatim=av6cliat | s&dliu sadliu Manibhadra 
anujan&mi mi 
The obverse page lias the following : — 
manta varnavanta yasasvina 6 [||] 
Malia-bala-maha-k[d]ya va [|] 
. na . manasa Buddliam vandanti Gautama 7 [l|] 
Eumbhakarno Eikumbhas=clia Siddharttham=aparajitam [|] 
ma . 
. . . danto clia Sahasrakslias=cha Pingala [||] 
Kavilo Dbarmadirnas=cha Ugratejo . . 
• ' D] 
. . tvam saranam y&nti su-p-prasannena cbetasa 9 [||] 
tad=yatba kadye-kodye 19 ... . 
W This is tlio passage referred to in my paper “ Tlio Third Instalment of the 
Bower MSS. ” in the Indian Antiquary, Yol. XXI, p. 369. On another leaf of the 
same MS., the word occurs once more, but spelled Uklch6rdda with a long d. I wish 
to take this opportunity to correct my reading of the word in the Bower MS. It is 
there spelt IcaUkhurda, with the jihviimuliya before kh, not Icavhhorda, as I first read 
it. I owe this correction to a suggestion of Dr. A. Stein, who informs mo that in 
modern S'arada. writing the difference between a superscribed r and the jihvamfiliya 
is very small. He suggests that there may be a clerical error in the Bower MS. 
This, however, is not probable. The forms of the superscribed r and tho jihvamfiliya 
are widely different in the Bower MS., but on tho other hand (as, for that matter, 
in S'arada also) there is a resemblance between tho super-compounded v and the 
jilivamuliya. Hence I took the symbol to bo that for v, while I should have recog- 
nized it as the symbol of tho jilivamuliya. Dr. Stein, further, informs mo that the 
word Icalclchurda occurs also in VII, 298 of the Bajataranginl, in the form Jchurlchuta, 
and that it is still used in modern Kashmiri in tho form Tchurilchdkhus. Ho suggests 
that it is rather these more modern forms that represent the proper spelling of the 
word, with reference to the correct placement of r (i. e., karlchdda, not Icalchorda) . 
I do not agree with this; we have, in the Bower MSS. and the Weber MSS., the 
earliest (known) spellings of the word, compared with which tho more modern spell- 
ings in tho BAjatarangini and in Kashmiri are more likely to be corruptions. 
1® Perhaps atyattra is an error for anyattra, and vipdM na may have to bo 
separated. 
19 The letter which I have read dy is doubtful. For a facsimile of it, see Plate 
IV of the alphabet. 
J. i. 4 
1 , 
2 
3, 
4, 
