XVI 
CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. 
Phtsa. 
(?) Coromandelica, 1 2 3 Danker. 
Camptoceras. 
Austeni, Bl. t. 158, f. 3, 4. 
lineata, Bl. t. 158, f. 5, 6. 
terebra, Bl. t. 158, f. 1, 2. 
Limnjia . 4 
acuminata, Lam. t. 69, f. 8, 9. 
amygdalus, Trosch. t. 69, f. 7, 10. 
auricularia, 5 Linnaeus, 
brevicauda, Sow. t. 158, f. 7. 
chlamys, 6 Bn. t. 69, f. 5, 6. 
luteola, Lam. t. 70, f. 5, 6. 
marginata, 7 Michaud, in Drap. Sup. 
ovalis, Gray, t. 70, f. 2, 3, 4. 
peregra, 5 Linnaeus, 
pinguis, Dohrn, t. 70, f. 7, 8, 10. 
rufescens, Gray, t. 69, f. 1, 4 ; t. 70, 
f. 1, 9. 
stagnalis, 5 Lin. 
tigrina, 8 Dohrn. 
truncatula, 5 Muller. 
Melania . 9 
acanthica, Dohrn (as of Lea), t. 
110, f. 10. 
baccata, Gould, t. 75, f. 1 to 4. 
Batana, Gould, t. 74, f. 8, 9. 
Broti, Dohrn, t. 71, f. 2, 3. 
confusa, Dohrn, t. 72, f. 4. 
datura, Dohrn, t. 73, f. 10. 
episcopalis, Lea, t. 72, f. 7 ; t. 75, 
f. 5, 7. 
fuscata, Born, t. 109, f. 4. 
gloriosa, Anth. t. 72, f. 1, 2. 
Hanleyi, G. A. t. 110, f. 5. 
Herculea, Gould, t. 72, f. 5 ; t. 109, 
f. 7. 
Hugeli, Phil. t. 71, f. 5, 6. 
humerosa, 10 Gould (Tavoy). 
Iravadica, Bl. t. 71, f. 1. 
jugicostis, Bn. t. 110, f. 8, 9. 
Layardi, Dolirn, t. 73, f. 9. 
lineata, Gray, t. 71, f. 7. 
Menkiana, Lea, t. 110, f. 6. 
pagodula, Gould, t. 153, f. 3. 
Peguensis, 11 Ant. t. 72, f. 6. 
praemorsa, Try on, t. 153, f. 2. 
pyramis, Bn. t. 110, f. 3, 4. 
Reevei, Brot. t. 72, f. 3; t.153, f. 1, 5, 
Riqueti, Grat. t. 71, f. 10. 
rudis, Lea, t. 74, f. 7, 10. 
scabra, Mull. t. 73, f. 1 to 4; var. 
elegans, t. 73, f. 5, 6, 7; var. ? 
spinulosa, t. 110, f. 7. 
spinata, G. A. t. 109, f. 1. 
terebra, Bn. t. 71, f. 8, 9. 
tigrina, Hutt. t. 110, f. 1, 2. 
Tirouri ? Fer. t. 74, f. 5, 6. 
tuberculata, Mull. t. 74, f. 1 to 4; 
t. 73, f. 8, as Layardi. 
variabilis, 12 Bn. t. 109, f. 2, 3, 5, 6; 
yar. spinosa, t. 75, f. 5, 6. 
zonata, Bn. t. 71, f. 4. 
Navicella. 
caerulescens, Reeve, t. 137, f. 2, 3. 
compressa, Pear. t. 137, f. 1, 4. 
Livesayi, Dohrn, t. 137, f. 8, 9. 
reticulata, Reeye, t. 137, f. 5, 6, 
squamata, Dohrn, t. 157, f. 1,4. 
Ancylus . 1 
Ceylanica, Bn. t. 81, f. 1, 4. 
verruca, Bn. t. 81, f. 2, 3. 
Cahptonyx. 
Theobaldi, Bn. t. 81, f. 5, 6. 
SUCCINEA . 2 
acuminata, Bl. t. 68, f. 7. 
Baconi, Pf. t. 68, f. 1, 4. 
Bensoni, Pf. t. 67, f. 9. 
Ceylanica, Pf. t. 158, f. 10. 
collina, Bl. t. 68, f. 8, 9, 10. 
crassiuscula, Bn. t. 68, f. 5, 6. 
daucina, Pf. t. 67, f. 7. 
Girnarica, Th. t. 67, f. 5, 6. 
Indica, Pf. t. 67, f. 1, 4. 
Pfeifferi, Rossm. (Cashmire). 
plicata, Bl. t. 67, f. 8. 
pntris, Lin. (Cashmire). 
rutilans, Bl. t. 67, f. 10. 
subgranosa, Pf. t. 158, f. 8, 9. 
semiserica, Gould, t. 67, f. 2, 3. 
vitrea, Pf. t. 68, f. 2, 3. 
Lithotis. 
rupicola, Bl. t. 81, f. 7. 
tumida, Bl. t. 81, f. 8, 9. 
1 The A. Baconi of Bourgignat, if distinct, has not been 
found by our Indian collectors. 
2 Compare 'with our species the S. rugosa of Pfeiffer (Mon. 
Helic. vol. 2, p. 517), said to have only two and a half whorls, 
an extremely short spire, and to come from near Pondicherry. 
5 Mai. Bliit. 1862. Two immature specimens of a short- 
spired Physa were obtained at Quilon by Benson, but have not 
the carinated spire of this (Australian ?) species. 
4 Kuster’s monograph has been vainly studied. Besides 
sundry from that latitudinarian locality “ E. Indies,” there is a 
L. oliva (? = luteola)from Bengal, and a L. striata (as of Benson!) 
from Barrakpore, Mr. W. Blanford has sent us a specimen from 
near Le, Thibet, of what proves to be the L. scalaris of the 
Conch. Iconica, which is perhaps the biformis of Kuster, and 
possibly the lagotis of Kobelt (Mai. Blat. 1872). It is possibly 
a distorted peregra. In Wiegmann’s Archives for 1837 is a 
paper by Troschel on the Gangetic species, but the descriptions 
are much too brief. His prunum seems our pinguis, var. (f. 8), 
and not unlikely is the succinea of Deshayes (Yoy. Belang. Zool. 
pi. 2, f. 13, 14) from Malabar, which is not the shell so termed 
in Reeve’s ‘ Iconica’ ; his patula we refer to rufescens ; his 
impura is unknown to us ; his cerasum, sulcatula, and nucleus, 
are evidently either ovalis or luteola. 
5 Prom Affghanistan and Cashmire: too well known to 
figure. L. Bactriana of Hutton (inadequately described in J. 
Asi. Beng. 1849, p. 656) was, perhaps, peregra. 
6 L. hians of Sowerby’s monograph (C. Icon. Lim. f. 57, a) 
is the young. 
7 From the Shan Provinces. 
8 The type is just like a streaked form of Benson’s L. bulla ; 
we doubt it as a species. 
9 See also M. fluctuosa of Gould (Pr. Bost. N. H. vol. 2, p. 
219 ; Otia, p. 200) from Tavoy, which is too curtly described to 
be identified. The Travancore Clea! Anneslyi (Pseudoliva 
Nassoides Hanl.) of Benson (An. Nat. H. 1860, p. 258), lives 
in saltish water. 
10 Proc. Bost. N. II. vol. 2 (1847); Otia, p. 200. “Allied 
to M. Virginica, Say.” 
11 The reference to the American Journal must be expunged; 
it is only a manuscript species. 
12 Too much latitude has been given to this species. We have 
figured the variabilis, var. vittata of Theobald (J. Asi. Beng. 
