CATALOGUE OF THE VICTORIAN CICADID^E. 
M. LANDSBOEOUGHI, Dist. 
Melampsalta landsboroughi, Dist., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1882, 
p. 131, pi. VII., fs. 14 a, b ; God. and Frogg., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 
1904, p. 639. 
Melampsalta tristriqata, God. and Froqq., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W., 
1904, p. 638. 
(Note. — Determined by G-od. and Frogg. in the Macleay Museum 
and also in the National Museum, Melbourne, as M. tristrigata, 
God. and Frogg. Also determined in the female form in the latter 
collection by G-od. and Frogg., as M. incepta, Walk. The species 
is very variable, both in colour and size, especially in the female form.) 
M. torrid a, Erich. 
Cicada torrida, Erich., Arch. I., p. 286, 1842. 
Cicada basiflamma, Walk., List. Horn., /., p. .170, 1850. 
Cicada connexa, Walk., loc. cit., p. 173. 
Cicada damater. Walk., loc. cit., p. 178. 
Melampsalta torrida, God. and Frogg., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 
1904, p. 631. 
(Note. — Two specimens, male and female, in the collection 
determined correctly by Walker; several determined as M. inter- 
rupts ? Walker has also determined a Western Australian species 
as Cicada basiflamma, and Goding and Froggatt have correctly 
described this as their type of M. rubricincta.) 
M. RUBRISTRIGATA, God. and Frogg. 
Melampsalta rubristrigata, God. and Frogg., Proc. Linn. Soc. 
N. S.W., 1904, p. 638. 
(Note. — These specimens were sent to me by Mr. G. Ly ell, from 
Horsham. Recorded by Goding and Froggatt from South Australia 
only.) 
M. OXLEYI, Dist. 
Melampsalta oxleyi, Dist., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., p. 131, 1882 
God, and Frogg., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W., 1904, p. 655. 
(Note. — This species, so far, has only been recorded from Queens- 
land.) 
M. LABYRINTHICA, Walk. 
Dundubia labyrinthica, Walk., List Horn., p. 75, 1850. 
Melampsalta labyrinthica, Stdl., Ofv. Vet, Ak Fork p 484 1862 * 
God. and Frogg, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. IT., 1904, p. 646. 
Cicada mterstans, Walk., List Horn. Sup., p 32 1858 
Melampsalta inter stans, Stdl., Ofv. Vet, Ak F'6rh ' p 484 186? - 
God. and Frogg., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 1904, p. 634. 
(Note.— One_ specimen determined as C. sericea by Walker The 
confusion has arisen through the generally lighter colour of the female. 
Both sexes are described by Walker under different names ) 
[ 26 ] 
