TYPES OF LEPIDOPTERA. 
26. Azelina biplaga is a good species, which has been re- 
described as Metrocampa glaucias, Meyr. 
27. Passa pygaeroides = S my nodes aplectaria, Gn. 
28. Monoctenia decora is a pale variety of Monoctenia 
vinaria, Gn. 
29. Arnissa simplex belongs to the genus Anthda ( Lyman - 
triadae). The type is an obscure 9 , and I was not 
able to identify the species. 
30. Tephrosia scitiferata = Selidosema mundifera, Wlk. 
31. Tephrosia fulgurigera = Selidosema excursaria, Gn., a 
variety with thickened dark-fuscous lines on wings. 
32. Asthena vexata = Euchoeca rubropunctaria, Wlk. 
33. Macaria comptata = Diastictis australiana, Gn. 
34. Larentia approximate, has been since described as 
Phrissogonus pyretodes, Meyr. The type is a £ and 
rather darker than usual. 
35. Larentia gelidata (Walker’s M.S. label reads Larentia 
algidata ”) is a 9 example of Xanthorhoe subidaria, Gn. 
36. Oesymna stipataria is a 9 example of Microdes squamu- 
lata, Gn. 
37. Eupithecia destructata has been since described as Phris- 
sogonus catastreptes, Meyr. In this instance onlj I 
had no example to compare with the type, but I am 
confident of mv identification. 
38. Acrobasis subcultella = Epipaschia nauplialis, Wlk. 
39. Hypata moderatella = Chlenias arietaria, Gn. 
40. DicheS.ia vicariana = Cacoecia postvittana. Wlk. 
41. Sperchia intractana is, I believe, the species described by 
Meyrick under the name of Capua obfuscatana. 
42. Tinea annosella has been since described as Xysmatodona 
saxosa, Meyr. 
43. Tinea arctidla has been since described as Lepidoscia 
comochora, Meyr. 
44. Tinea nivibractella is a good species of the genus Monopis, 
Hb. I give a full description below. 
45. Tinea intritella has been redescribed as Phloeopola 
46. 
47. 
exarcha, Meyr. . 
Huvonomeuta ? viduata is a good species which may _ be 
provisionally referred to the genus Xylorycta. Besides 
the tvpe there are three examples m the .National 
Museum, all imperfect and without palpi. (Localities : 
Melbourne and Kewell, Vie.) 
Chimabacche saxipenneUa. This is, I have no doubt a 
species of the genus Agriophara, but as the type has 
now no fore wings, palpi, antennae, nor abdomen, it 
would be rash to identify it more particularly. 
[ 19 1 
Bz 
