VETERINARY JURISPRUDENCE. 
619 
(the Council having previously resolved to take no steps in the 
matter), unless at a special meeting, of which notice must be 
given. 
After some conversation it was resolved, on the motion of 
Mr . Wilkinson , seconded by Mr. DicJcens , (< that the committee 
appointed by the Council be requested to wait upon the 
governors at their next meeting, on the 14th of October, and 
that they make their report at the next quarterly meeting of 
the Council.” 
Messrs. Dickens, Jones, and the Secretary, were named as 
the committee of supervision of this and the preceding 
meeting ; and the proceedings then terminated. 
Charles Dickens, 
John Jones, 
E. N. Gabriel. 
Veterinary Jurisprudence. 
NISI prius court. 
Before Lord Chief Justice Campbell. 
Goy v . Norfolk. — An action for the price of a horse sold 
with a warranty was brought at the Lincoln Assizes on 
Tuesday. The plaintiff, Mr. Goy, is a horse-dealer at 
Wragby; and the defendant, Mr. Norfolk, a farmer in the 
same neighbourhood. The sale of the horse took place on 
the 28th of September. It was a big chesnut horse, which 
plaintiff had bought six days before at Howden fair, on which 
occasion he rode and jumped him, and found him, as he 
stated, quite sound, free from cough, and in good general 
condition. He paid 32^. 10s. for him, and on the 28th resold 
him to the defendant for 48^. — a warranty being given on 
both occasions. When the defendant bought he also rode 
the horse, and expressed himself, as the plaintiff said, quite 
satisfied with him. He said that he did not like so big a 
horse, as they were liable to go roarers ; but after the trial 
he liked him better “ by all the money.” The horse vras sent 
home to the defendant the next day ; and, according to the 
plaintiffs evidence, the defendant about a fortnight afterwards 
told him that he was quite pleased with the horse, that he 
was very fresh, and that he was a capital jumper ; but two or 
three weeks later, when the plaintiff spoke to him about 
