VETERINARY J UlUSPRUEENCh. 
533 
ance in this very important particular. We trust that the sub- 
ject will be again considered by the honourable Baronet, and that 
when the bill is brought forward in a more perfect state, we may 
find some decided provisions made to effect, in a degree at least, 
the suppression of illegal practice. There will be found, no 
doubt, many difficulties in the way of it ; but without some 
attempt of the kind, one of the great requisites in reform will be 
left unfulfilled. In our opinion, it is to the want of power, to the 
want of legal support under which our corporate bodies labour, 
that many of the evils we have now to complain of are to be 
traced, rather than to any thing fundamentally wrong in the 
constitution of those bodies. And whatever reformed system 
may be adopted, whatever institutions may be placed over us, 
unless more effectual legal authority be vouchsafed to us, unless 
we have more power of maintaining our own rights, and of de- 
fending the regular practitioner from the aggressions of the igno- 
rant pretender, our condition will not be much improved, and 
we shall have the trouble of going over the same ground of dis- 
cussion and conflict which has now so long agitated the medical 
world. 
VETERINARY JURISPRUDENCE. 
Greville v. Chapman. 
Having been subpoenaed at Gyiildford on the 4th of August 
last, on the singular trial relating to the horse Canadian, 1, 
perhaps, may be expected to give a short account of that which 
I saw and heard, for it has made a great impression on horsemen 
every where, and will necessarily lead to. very considerable change 
in the management of turf affairs. 
Colonel Peel and Mr. Greville had made a joint book — a 
£10,000 book —in which they betted against every horse that 
was entered for the Derby, and the guide of their proceedings 
was so to arrange their book as to give themselves a reason- 
