X 
CONCHOLOGIA 1NDICA. 
obtusa, 1 Stol. (near Moulmein). 
Perotteti, 2 Petit, t. 98, f. 5, G. 
Petiti, Gould, t. 8, f. 4. 
Sankeyi, 3 Bn. 
solidnla, Stol. t. 98, f. 7. 
Theobaldi, Bn. t. 8, f. 9. 
Watsoni, Bis. t. 8, f. 8. 
Pupa. 
Avanica, Bn. t. 160, f. 7. 
bathjodon, Bn. t. 100, f. 7. 
(En.) bieolor, Hutt. t. 100, f. 6. 
Blanfordiana, G. A. t. 100, f. 2. 
brevicostis, 4 Bn. 
(En.) Ceylanica, Pf. t. 100, f. 4. 
cylindroidea, Stol. t. 160, f. 10. 
diopsis, Bn. t. 101, f. 10. 
eurina, Bn. t. 101, f. 7. 
Evezardi, Bl. t. 101, f. 5, 6. 
(En.) fartoides, Th. t. 100, f. 5. 
tilosa, Th. & St. t. 160, f. 5. 
gntta, Bn. t. 101, f. 9. 
Himalayana, Hutt. t. 101, f. 4. 
Huttoniana, Bn. t. 101, f. 3. 
Indica, Pf. t. 160, f. 8. 
lapidaria, Hutt. t. 100, f. 10. 
lignicola, Stol. t. 160, f. 6. 
miruula, Bn. t. 160, f. 4. 
muscerda, Bn. t. 160, f. 2. 
(En.) Pirriei, Pf. t, 100, f. 1. 
planguncula, Bn. t. 101, f. 2. 
plicidens, Bn. t. 100, f. 3. 
Salemensis, Bl. t. 160, f. 10. 
Salwiniana, Th. t. 100, f. 9. 
(En.) scnlpta, Bl. t. 160, f. 1. 
seriola, Bn. t. 101, f. 8. 
serrula, 5 Bn. 
stenopylis, Bn. t. 101, f. 1. 
tutula, Bn. t. 156, f. 6. 
vara, Bn. t. 100, f. 3. 
Clostophis. 
Sankeyi, Bn. t. 133, f. 10. 
Clausilia. 
Arakanensis, Th. t. 118, f. 8, 9. 
Asaluensis, G. A. t. 159, f. 5. 
bacillum, 6 Bn. t. 24, f. 1. 
bulbus, Bn. t. 24, f. 5. 
Ceylanica, Bn. t. 118, f. 1. 
cylindrica, Gray, t. 24, f. 4. 
ferrugmea, Bl. t. 118, f. 5, 6. 
fusiformis, Bl. t. 24, f. 6. 
Gouldiana, Pf. t. 118, f. 2, 3. 
insignis, Gould, t. 24, f. 2, 3. 
Ios, Bn. t. 24, f. 10. 
| loxostoma, Bn. t. 24, f. 7. 
Masoni, Th. t. 24, f. 8. 
monticola, G. A. t. 118, f. 7. 
ovata, Bl. t. 118. f. 4. 
Philippiana, Pf. t. 118, f. 10. 
Theobaldi, 7 Bl. 
Vespa, 8 Gould (Birmah). 
tuba, Haul. t. 24, f. 9. 
Waageni, 9 Stolic. 
Bulimus . 10 
Abyssinicus, 11 Rup. t. 21, f. 1. 
adumbratus, Pf. t. 148, f. 8. 
Agrensis, Kurr, t. 23, f. 1. 
albizonatus, Reeve, t. 21, f. 8. 
Andamanicus, Thorp, t. 148, f. 10. 
arcuatus, Hutt. t. 20, f. 2. 
atricallosus, 12 Gould (Tavoy). 
Bengalensis, Lam. t. 80, f. 7 ; t. 
148, f. 6. 
Bontise, Chem. t. 80, f. 5. 
Boysianus, Bn. t. 22, f. 6. 
Calcadensis, Bedd. t. 148, f. 2, 3. 
candelaris, Pf. t. 19, f. 2. 
Ceylonicus, Bn. t. 21, f. 2 ; t. 148, 
f. 9, var. 
Chion, Pf. t. 22, f. 1. 
Cingalensis, Bn. t. 79, f. 1. 
coelebs, Bn. t. 80, f. 1 ; var. cera- 
tinus, t. 80, f. 2. 
ccenopictus, 13 Hutt. t. 22, f. 9. 
densus, Pf. t. 79, f. 6. 
domina, Bn. t. 22, f. 5. 
eremita, Bn. t. 23, f. 6. 
Estellus, Bn. t. 22, f. 4. 
Fairbanki, Pf. t. 20, f. 9. 
gracilis, Hutt. t. 23, f. 4. 
Griffithi, Bn. t. 23, f. 5. 
Haughtoni, Bn. t. 19, f. 1 ; t. 89, f. 5. 
hebes, Bl. t. 79, f. 10. 
insularis, Ehr. t. 22, f. 10. 
intermedius, Pf. t. 19, f. 6, 8. 
1 J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 187b vol. 40, pt. 2, p. 106, pi. 7, f. 11, I 
12, 13. 
2 Compare the S. Footei, or Perotteti Footei var. of the Blan- * 
ford’s (J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 1861, p. 358, pi. 2, f. 6) from Southern 
India. 
3 Our supposed variety (pi. 8, f. 7) has been separated by [ 
Stoliczka as S. Hanleyana (J. Asi. Beng. 1871, pi. 7, f. 15) : he 
is quite right in regarding the form with a more tapering and 
rounded mouth as better suited to Benson’s description (Pfeif. 
Mon. Hel. vol. 5, p. 442), although Benson’s drawing (in our 
possession) represents the other. Had we then possessed the 
typical Sankeyi, we should have preferentially figured it : it is 
very like our pi. 98, f. 10, only has not a smooth base or a second 
lamellar tubercle. Our figured specimen is quite as large as the 
more characteristic form (J. Asi. Beng. 1871, vol. 40, pt. 2, p. 
167, pi. 7, f. 14). 
4 Bens. An. Nat. II. 1849, ser. 2, vol. 4. — Pfeif. Mon. Hel. 
vol. 3, p. 560: Kust. td. Chernn. Pup. pi. 17, f. 21, 22. Barrak- 
pore, Bengal. 
5 An. Nat. Hist. 1863, ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 427. — Pfeif. Mon. 
Hel. vol. 6, p. 319. Central India. 
6 Identical with the undescribed ignota of Th. 
7 J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 1872, vol. 41, pt. 2. p. 201, pi. 9, f. 5 : 
Tonghu ; Birmah. 
s Proc. Bost, N. H. 1859, vol. 6, p. 12: Otia, p. 220. — Pf. 
Mon. vol. 6, p. 409 : from Tavoy ; has six whorls only. Can it 
be Philippiana ? Compare also the vespa of J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 
1872, vol. 41, pt. 2, p. 209, pi. 9, f. 15. 
3 J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 1872, vol. 41, pt. 2, pi. 9, f. 19: Chan- 
gligalli, near Marri, W. Himalayah. 
10 See, also, the B. Huttoni, Pf. (Symb. pt. 3, p. 55 ; Mon. 
Helic. vol. 2, p. 118 ; Rust. ed. Chz. Bui. t. 17, f. 3, 4) from the 
“ E. Indies.” 
11 To this group belongs the B. Malabaricus of Pfeiffer (Mai. 
Blat. 1857, p. 156); Mon. Hel. vol. 4, p. 411, from Ahmed- 
nuggur. 
12 Proc. Bost. 1843, vol. 1 (copied Otia, p. 189); Bost. J. 
Nat. H. vol. 4, p. 457, pi. 24, f. 3. — Desh. Fer. Mol. t. 130. f. 9, 
10. 
13 The types of the B. lardeus of Pfeiffer. (Proc. Z. 1852, p. 
157), from the “ E. Indies,” belong to this species. 
