CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. 
viii 
gratulator, Bl. t. 16, f. 2, 6. 
Grevillei, Pf. t. 127, f. 7. 
Guerini, 1 Pf. t. 55, f. 1, 2. 
liaemastoma, Lin. t. 127, f. 2. 
kariola, Bn. t. 14, f. 6. 
Haugktoni, 2 Bn. t. 28, f. 3. 
Iiebescens, Bl. t. 149, f. 1. 
lielicifera, Bl. t. 50, f. 3, 4. 
Helferi, Bn. t. 28, f. 8, 9. 
hemiopta, Bn. t. 30, f. 4 ; t. 53, f. 8. 
Hodgsoni, Bl. t. 30, f. 1, 2, 3. 
lionesta, Gould, t. 90, f. 10. 
Immilis, Hut. t. 61, f. 4, 5, 6. 
Humberti, Bvot, t. 159, f. 9. 
Huttoni, Pf. t. 15, f. 8. 
byba, Bn. t. 30, f. 2, 3. 
bypbasma, Bn. t. 54, f. 3. 
liypoleuca, Bl. t. 64, f. 6, 7. 
immerita, Bl. t. 150, f. 7. 
Indica, Pf. t. 55, f. 10. 
infausta, Bl. t. 159, f. 2, 3. 
infrendens, 3 Gould, t. 15, f. 3, var. 
(as Tickellii). 
infula, Bn. t. 54, f. 9. 
Ingrami, Bl. t. 60, f. 9, 10. 
injussa, Bl. t. 132, f. 5, 6. 
interrupta, 4 Bu. t. 27, f. 3. 
intumescens, Bl. t. Ill, f. 6. 
Isabella, Pf. t. 27, f. 7. 
Juliana, Gray, t. 52, f. 7. 
Karenornm, Bl. t. 13, f. 6. 
Koondaensis, Bl. t. 56, f. 5, 6. 
Kumahensis, 1 * 3 4 5 Tk. & Stol. 
labiata, Pf. t. 27, f. 5. 
Ifevipes, 6 Mull. 
Laidlayana, Bn. t. 58, f. 3, 4, 5. 
Layardi, Pf. t. 56, f. 8. 
lecytkis, Bn. t. 63, f. 7, 8, 9. 
leiopkis, 7 Bn. t. 13, f. 8. 
levicula. Bn. t. 90, f. 1, 4. 
ligulata, 8 Per. t. 28, f. 9. 
liratula, Pf. t. 150, f. 5, 6. 
liricincta, Stol. t. 132, f. 7. 
lixa, Bl. t. 149, f. 5, 6. 
lubrica, Bn. t. 51, f. 8, 9. 
macrompkalos, Tk. t. 83, f. 8, 9. 
macropleuris, 9 Bn. t. 87, f. 10. 
Maderaspatana, Gray, t. 28, f. 2. 
mammillaris, Bl. t. 50, f. 1, 2. 
melanotragus, Born, t. 127, f. 3. 
Merguiensis, Pliil. t. 14, f. 7. 
raiccyla, Bn. t. 129, f. 8, 9. 
molecula, Bn. t. 30, f. 8, 9. 
mononema, Bn. t. 87, f. 2, 3. 
monticola, Hutt. t. 52, f. 3. 
mucosa, 10 Bis. t. 90, f. 5, 6. 
Munipurensis, 11 G. A. (Munipur). 
Nagaensis, 12 G. A. (Prowi, Naga 
Hills). 
nana, 13 Hutt. t. 61, f. 7, 8, 9. 
nebulosa, Bl. t. 64, f. 8, 9, 10. 
Hekerensis, Bn t. 32, f. 5, 6. 
nepos, Pf. t. 132, f. 2, 3. 
Nicobarica, Beck, t. 52, f. 1. 
Nilagirica, Pf. t. 55, f. 6, 7. 
nitida, Muller (Caskmire). 
novella, Pf. t. 150, f. 8. 
nuda, Pf. t. 31, f. 7, 10. 
oclithoplax, Bn. t. 26, f. 4. 
odontopkora, Bn. t. 57, f. 4, 5, 6 
Oldkami, Bn. t. 15, f. 7. 
orcula, Bn. t. 87, f. 1, 4. 
ornatissima, Bn. t. 60, f. 4. 
Orobia, Bn. t. 28, f. 8. 
oxytes, Bn. t. 26, f. 1. 
palmaria, Bn. t. 30, f. 5, 6. 
pansa, Bn. t. 56, f. 1. 
partita, 14 Pf. t. 84, f. 5, 6. 
Patane, Bn. t. 130, f. 5, 6, 7. 
pauxillula, Bn. t. 90, f. 8, 9. 
pedina, Bn. t. 51, f. 3. 
Peguensis, Bn. t. 58, f. 6. 
perarcta, Bl. t. 13, f. 3. 
pereompressa, 15 Bl. 
perfucata, 16 Bn. 
perpaula, 17 Bn. 
Petasus, Bn. t. 89, f. 8, 9. 
petrosa, 18 Hutt. t. 88, f. 7, 10. 
Pkayrei. Tk. t. 15, f. 1. 
Pkidias, Tliorp. t. 149, f. 4, 
1 Compare with this and crinigera the Nilgherry H. tabida 
of Pfeiffer (Mon. Hel. Ami. 4, p. 27: NoAut. vol. 1, pi. 12. f. 11, 
12). It is larger and not keeled. 
- The H. Chamberti of Tryon (Amer. J. C. vol. 5, pi. 10, f. 
2) is a synonym. 
3 In Proc. Bost. 1843, p. 139, and Bost. .T. Nat. H. A r ol. 4, p. 
453, pi. 24, f. 6. Pfeiff. Mon. Hel. vol. 1, p. 152. Reeve, C. 
Icon. Hel. f. 770. The A'ariety Tickellii only differs in being 
more carinated, and having the twin teeth closer together. 
4 The true H. Himalayana of Lea (Obs. Unio, vol. 1, pi. 19, 
f. 66) is referred by Blanford to this species; but Benson’s 
erroneous ideal (Zool. J. A r ol. 5) was the H. cicatricosa. 
5 J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 1872, A'ol. 41. pt. 2. p. 334, pi. 11, f. 
9, 10 : Kumah Hills, Sandoway, Aracan Hills. 
6 See Pf. Mon. Hel. vol. 3, p. 75, and Ivust. Ch. Hel. pi. 84, 
f. 22, 23. 
7 If this should prove, as is possible, the true refuga of Gould, 
that name has priority : it resembles the refuga of Reeve, Philippi, 
and Kuster : yet the latter (Hel. t. 66, f. 21-23) does not show 
the lamella correctly, nor the spiral sculpture, and almost 
equally Avith the second makes the outline of the last Avhorl 
opposite the mouth as prominent below as above, instead of 
slanting inwards below as in leiophis. 
8 The unique example from Tranquebar of the Nanina tur- 
binata of Beck (Ap. Mol. Christ. Fred. p. 5, and Morch, J. Con. 
vol. 20 (1872, p. 33), said to remind one of this shell, being in 
the Danish Museum is inaccessible to us. 
9 The II. corys of Benson (An. Nat. 1859, ser. 2, vol. 3, p. 
265) is the young of this shell. 
10 The H. seposita of Benson (An. Nat. Hist. 1859, April) is 
only knoAAm to us by a sketch of Benson’s, which precisely 
resembles shells gb'en us by Blanford as his mucosa. 
11 Z. P. 1874, p. 610, pi. 73. f. 6, as H. (Plect.). 
12 Z. P. 1874, p. 609. pi. 73, f. 4, as H. (Plect.). 
13 Benson statestkat the bullula of Reeve represents this shell. 
" In the Zoology of Belanger’s Voyage we find (Moll. p. 414, 
pi. 1, f. 8. 9, 10) a H. semifusca, from near Pondicherry. Its 
figure reminds us of this shell, but it is said to have eight or nine 
whorls (four more than are represented). That of Pfeiffer is 
really Indian, and quite distinct. The H. marcida of Benson 
(An. Nat. 1853, p. 92) is generally considered a form of partita, 
or some near ally (subopaca, &c.). The date is subsequent to 
that of the species so named by Shuttleworth (1852). 
15 Pr. Zool. 1869, p. 446. Near sanis : from Bhamo. 
16 An.Nat.H.1853,p.93. — Pf.Mon.Hel.vol.4,p.50 fromCeylon. 
17 An. Nat. H. 1859, p. 390.— Pf. Mon. Hel. Ami. 5, p. 69 : 
from Phie Than, Tenasserim. 
18 Benson erroneously identified this shell with the imper- 
forated five-whorled H. vitrinoides of Deshayms (Mag. de Z. 1831, 
pi. 26), of which the locality was then unknown. In Kuster’s 
