Analysis of Books. 
[Mafch, 
170 
3^3B§S3SS2£ 
PF¥m!SBSB£m 
certa nlTinl ierLle that grounds provided for the . of 
sssssshsks 
hesitation on the part of persons interested. 
The Agnostic : a Monthly Journal of Liberal Thought. Vol. I. 
Nos. 1 and 2 . London : H. Cattell and Co. . . 
In this new Journal we find ma^tter^diffenn^^reatlyjsoth^ni ^.ts 
tendencies, and as it PP expression “ liberal thought,” 
n0 f„ e n° f uth h e e r V e e 4 y m ' n‘ ti ^e'meet ^h s°uch phrases as the 
Tnnhlic 'S”he liberal movement, "-a “ Religious Liberal- 
'll Now we submit that the terms thus used stand in 
ism, oc c. i>o j efined What is “ liberal thought, 
S ° a e u nee do4 it diffe^from thought which is non-liberal, or which 
and rfhheral’ Precision is here all the more needed since the 
«5^ar th O b M S -c! gs«. 
-TP 
lansm. I he becu P >f P £ secQnd essay he strlves to clear 
truth, but not the wiio nrotests against “ the utter 
away certain labelling systems.” With equal force and 
emptiness of o . P (< quest i 0 n of the modern Athenian is not 
truth he writes .— 1 q what is it called ? And the 
Wha d^ S WeUve rs ^cnd* uP^n the name-that is the, stamp or 
labtltffixedt S novelty— and not upon the reality itself, the 
in Tral4u\4t lh ,4veTtfis o'niy. We are ruled by catch-words. 
