Exod. xxxi. 3; xxxv. 31; in Num. xxiv. 2 ; in 1 Sam x 10 • xi fi - 
“ 20 “a “ ; “ 2 Chr0n ' ”• 1 * *> 1 in EAxh 24 ' I 
not read the verses at this late hour, but the point of them would be to 
S°V “ .™ th “? f e wiU suit tb * facts that nothing else oan be meant 
Professor Chalks ^ ‘ "" * In hiS 38th p “ r “S raph 
“ In mahng this philosophic use of that chapter I propose to take it inst 
«rlL h* 1 ™ m a he S**"*!*. on account of the sanction which S 
fr,! am , “?r th f tllere is the ^ b «ath of a suspicion that there was 
of Genesk Th 1 ir wU ° h we I,ave b > the first chapter 
„„„ at 2, fi" 5 differences which arise are simply paraphrases, and it is 
not at all necessary to assume any other text, and therefore I think this 
annmheT- “a* a* * J - * ** “ **W, be ““« » is liable to mis- 
I^think anv , And s0 wlth re S” d to the quotations from the Septuagint. 
Ll ^ any ordinary reader would suppose that the author of the piper 
the New Test “‘’T" “ " hich 1“°“i°»s are dealt with in 
original Hebr T, “ S “ Ch that Ule S< ' ptu:i " int “ set entirely above the 
teZ c ha W eXt ,° f nUth0rit >'- 1 not say that that is Pro- 
was ■ and I thbTtw’-h"* r th ‘" k ° rdmarJ ' re »der would argue that it 
as , and I think that is unfortunate, because it is likely to do a great deal 
mischief. Mid it is not borne out by the facts. The great majority of the 
stiSrhtT "I ° f e ” Testament fro '" Old are simply L ordinary 
straightforward renderings which any average Greek scholar would have 
made in translating from the one to the other. There are a few passages 
where the quotation taken from the Septuagint differs from the Emdkh 
translations, but that is not the ease in any quoted here, and themfom h Tre 
zszzssr fot introducins “ noiher tat - 1 th “ k 
thfto^te ph^ , ^^’ F ' R ^'T.f 0 °° e lm yet toucl,ed 
e pe e„ee“h ^ h “ aP1, “ 0d 
experience to such things as matter, force, and inertia ; but sensation 
and experience are not the substratum of a great deal that fMl f j 
appears to me that Professor Challis has indulged in a verv 
use of imagination as Professor Tyndall calls if scientific 
that is purely a hypothesis • ^ ^ 
sensation orof experience. We can mt,“l ‘ L " 0t “‘“T oith “ » f 
or physically ; we know nothing of iS k n^^Xk S 
ex,sts. A, to atom,, an atom is generally supposed to uJZ an indiv lo 
