Notmthstamiing his admission of the term supra-conscious 
sciousnL^oVaT 111 ^ 8 th . at , whic 5 P ossesses not merely con - 
and better +1 ^ mvalent for consciousness, but* more 
Bei^ H r = Staffs 
Thil 'may notte of ““ ° f l' 1 ® expression " The Unconscious.” 
that K gle befo“e mU trSr Ce ^ the ' ^-Pl-ations 
literarv Prror ff V f 1 COUrse sav ours at least of 
„ * v enor > f not of an intention to deceive for the word 
mconscious ' will continue naturally to suggest what it in 
Hartmann” 
“ infinite fot/’L tre told ?p 539 ‘kth " 10Se temS - Th “ 
oouscousness is identical' with the 
s' ^assist 
indicated, nothin** but a vain nUt *• J “ ,7 as above 
similarly, referred the pure reason in man to U e Divi !e S °‘ 
The best thinker among the A, jostles nf n • ? T reasou - 
our inability “to think anvthino- 0 ^ ^ lmstiamty asserts 
sufficiency is of God ” The *most & nhn ° ?V rselves > but our 
to-day (by which I do not mean that wh/ch* J ^ !° logy ,° f 
speculative, much less fanciful but that W 1 ,V1 • m °, St pure ^ 
hensive in its hold upon facts) rcaffi rmV tt " “'"T 
thi8 is * -timar i^S^h^ 
