100 
lipads into corresponding and symmetrical groups, it is m no 
way intended to imply flat the answerers themselves may ^be 
arranged in the same way, it frequently happening that, eve 
ESfcan. of > single objection, pert ot «h. “““‘"Si 
rendered belongs to one group and part to another. in 
grouping has rfspect solely to the matter and spirit of the 
fnswers g not at all to the method of the answerers. It is pai tl, 
on Ihis account, and partly for other reasons sufficiently 
apparent, that in no case have the names of the parties holding 
them been attached to either objections or answers. 
^t now, these being the facts of the case, what are we to 
learn from them? The first impression which a review li 
tS Uncompleted makes upon the mind is probably m most 
that just complete tl Z nleasant to know that so many and 
cases a pleasing one. It is pieasaut «.u variecl 
seemingly insuperable objections have called forth so vane _ 
andTowerfnl a list of answers; and the conclusion may, and 
no doubt will, be drawn by many that, with such a host of 
defend^: t,e assault of Scmnce upun Secure = but be 
ture are numerous and zealous, but they are a motley an 
trh Vsr MX s "f | 
hypotheses of Science, of the constant flux of opinions in the 
scientific world, of the evil of hasty assumptions and biase 
interpretations ot phenomena, end tk. ,, 
objections founded open such * ” “Si E nil 
much truth and justice m all this. home Are 
such criticizers of Science first of all to look at home. A 
there no contradictory hypotheses among the defenders o 
existence of many conflicting hypotheses ? Well h .it remem 
bered that every one of these theories “ d ^“^hers of 
advocates and representatives also among 
Scripture • while over and above these there are a large number 
It may be said, however, that to expect scientific un y g 
