102 
Sr and reasoned on with strict impartiality. So m like 
rl £> J -j. 1. -u^ v i ew of the authority and character ot 
Scripture to base this, not on his ideas of what it ought _ to e, 
CitrA -- iW' >-• - “ a ,C 
Sat "4 ?=: s & sf sfsu-j 
« u? to- - [r-S.Cy— I,™ 
controversy. . A 
The CHAiRMAH.-The pleasing duty of proposing a vote of thanks to 1 r_ 
wLngto, to to "V “to aud a-pretotove p.p- deTol ' es “to" ™ * j 
st sssrs ssts si 
i=SHSra|gHi 
think the paper just read is evidently one upon 
which Mr. Warington has bestowed great pains, ^and shown “ ^ F °“' C ‘ 
very great ability. (Hear, hear.) He has dealt with his subject m a very 
