226 
.infolded by the differential and integral calculus, or their 
\srgh “ srssfi- 2 £ 
P °wSd feXdy maintain that all the works of creatkm 
carry with them a proof that they are works Resign, th 
*X=” — £ £ ™ « wh«t . ray 
structure of the eye and its adaptation to those laws of kg , 
3.-S: 3&=~ 
design in the eye, may read evidence as cogent tor it, m eve y 
animal or vegetable structure. Nay, he may go farther and 
Zt the most minute particle of dust, ^ ^o^hly mW- 
crated gives a proof to the rightly educated mind ol desig 
noties^ certain^ than the most marvellous structures i of organic 
life which are only more striking because moie easily re . 
Among the discussions of men, reputed to be men of science, 
wkv do we find such vain efforts to hide or evade this evidence 
of design ? and to form the works of nature by some chain of 
endless^ causation, some law of continuity, ^ich shall seem to 
=3 
law convey the impression of independence of a lawgiver 
We may trace it everywhere, wherever it is exhibffed 
manifest impatience of all miracle and all mystery. And here 
