79 
From the Author. 
Ditto. 
Messrs. Wyman. 
From the Author. 
Ditto. 
J. S. Crisp, Esq. 
“ Astronomical Observations.” J. G. Barclay, Esq. 
“ Bael Fruit.” Sir J. Fayrer, F.R.S. 
“ Brief.” 
“ Commentary on Isaiah.” Canon Birks 
“ Creation.” Bev. A. Stewart, M.D. 
“ Doctrine of a Future Life.” W. Alger. 
“ Egyptian Belief and Modern Thought.” J. Bon wick, Esq. From the Author , 
“ Future Life Papers by Eminent American Divines. „ Editor. 
“ Genesis.” Rev. G. V. Garland. Ditto. 
“ Implements of the Stone Age.” Rev. J. P. Thompson, D.D., LL.D. 
From the Author. 
By N. Whitley, Esq. Ditto. 
J. C. Southall. Ditto. 
A. Fraser, M.D., I.G.H. 
From the Author, 
“ Modern Pseudo-Philosophy.” J. M. Winn, Esq., M.D. Ditto. 
“ Palaeontology. Bibliography of N. American Invertebrata.” 
By Professor H. A. Nicholson, M.D. and W. White, Esq. 
Professor II. A. Nicholson, M.D. 
“ Physiological Metaphysics.” By President Porter, D.D., M.D. 
From the Author. 
“ Present Rights and Duties of Science.” Principal J. W. 
Dawson, LL.D., F.R.S. Ditto. 
“ Princetown Review.” Dr. Dawson, F.R.S. 
“ Why am I a Christian ? ” By W. R. Bradlaugh, Esq. From the Publisher. 
Also Pamphlets from J. Coutts, Esq., Rev. R. Douglas, Rov. G. W. 
Dalton, the Bishop of Haiti, and the Rev. G. Sexton, D.D. 
The following paper was then read by the Rev. T. M. Gorman, M.A., the 
Author being unavoidably absent. 
“ Is Palaeolithic Man a Reality.” 
“ Man’s Age in the World.” Dr. 
“ Medical Times for 1878.” 
“Metaphysics.” J. Muller. 
SCIENCE AND MAN: being Critical Remarks upon Prof. 
Tyndall’s Presidential Address, delivered before the 
Birmingham and Midland Institute. By Noah Porter, 
President of Yale College, United States. 
P ROFESSOR TYNDALL lias the reputation, and de- 
servedly, of being one of the most brilliant expounders 
of modern physics among living Englishmen. He is clear 
and condensed, vivacious and eloquent. It were hard to say 
whether insight or imagination, method or diction, has the 
most to do with his success. Though his themes are limited, 
he rarely repeats himself. The order of his thoughts is usually 
novel, and his illustrations and language are always fresh and 
varied. For these reasons he is always welcome as a lecturer, 
and he rarely disappoints his heai’ers. He shares with Prof. 
Huxlev the honour of having demonstrated, each in his own 
Q 2 
