169 
Page 6. Hora must be struck out, as not derived from the Egyptian 
Horus (an oversight of mine), but the others remain. 
Page 7. I will not epitomise the interesting note in which M. Maspero 
objects to the equivalence of Hophra with the Egyptian (| It is 
worthy of careful study. 
Si- aha seems to stand as the Egyptian “ son of the Moon- god.” 
I am much pleased to find M. Maspero of the same opinion as to Beth-ia. 
and gladly accept his correction as to the former elements in Kafenia or rather 
Gefenia, which if a Semitic name may mean “ Vine of Jah ” (see Gesen. on 
the use of |S2). 
M. Maspero objects with much reason to Brugseh’s identification of 
Penuel, mentioned in p. 7. If the reader will revert to the text of my paper, 
he will be able to assure himself that these acute and learned criticisms do 
not affect more than a few of my tentative suggestions, and I am the more 
happy to find that the main line of my inquiry approves itself to so high an 
authority as une bonne voie.” 
