336 
(3) Morality de facto implies more than it explains : 
and raises more questions than it solves : 
We ask to know more. 
(§ 116-119.) 
XVII. Imperfect Probations nevertheless are Heal Probations. 
(1) Responsibility and knowledge co-exist , always. 
Responsibility is enlarged by new knowledge. 
(Variety in the processes of gaining knowledge.) 
(2) No real modes of attaining knowledge can be thought to be 
a priori inadmissible. 
Revelation is subsequent to Responsibility ; 
cannot interfere with Responsible Freedom ; 
nor with prior truth. 
(3) Our right and duty in judging alleged Revelation. 
(§ 120-125.) 
XVIII. Differences of knowledge both before and after Revelation. 
Speculation as to the limits of knowledge, useless in practice 
and sometimes dangerous ; as involving denial of insight 
(which is termed Faith). 
(1) The Primary fact of our Relation to the Supreme, as Judge, 
showing the idea of Retribution in our consciousness. 
(2) The fact of Repentance for wrong — in relation with this. 
Connexion of Repentance with the Phenomenal ; 
and of Retribution with the True-always : 
and also of Mercy : 
(Details lie beyond our argument.) 
(3) A future life desired by beings related to the true-always. 
(§ 126-134.) 
XIX. False Teaching , never in relation to the true-always : 
but only adapting the phenomenal. 
(1) a Priori Theology, not primary in our argument. 
Modes of the Divine Consciousness, or Knowledge, — 
both lie beyond us. 
Contradictions as to knowledge, involved in the common idea 
of Predestination : 
(intellectual : and moral.) 
Fallacy of Stoics and Predestinarians. 
(2) a Posteriori solutions of Difficulties as to knowledge 
must be subject to our Deontology. 
Fallacy of “ Authoritative Faith,” 
and Authoritative Obedience. 
(3) Union of Authority and Conviction. 
(§ 135-141.) 
