174 
are thus taught that self-love is " Sue ltThe dLLe, 
duty, and that duty may he done or to itse lf, 
of self-love, society is conscious of a certain ua ^ ^ yQu 
and chalks out a line, saying, , ,, punishment 
must bear the punishment of transgress o . L P f th 
is disagreeable, as a ^ £Xces aver- 
punishable acts: this abstinen . , • : ts mos t general 
sion, and “such aversion is conscience m its most g 
tyl f/ ’ xt pi , p is a w hole string of fallacies. Laws are passed 
ffJBSSX 
fad.ooploco.i.W £,"« fa. » 
is that such aversion, even coni [ ^^l lmsia ’ oaAac t, 
andwho w^rJatove the power of 
& a - ti 
There being no parent whence^ came Ae chjd^ ^ 
weS noffSgtrd 
by it, and if 
hC lt' r T C ! is true that the Professor speaks of sympathy as an 
influence in favour of duty, but even here there is a c “ us ^ 
for society did not originate jmpa Ay, £ ^ 
to his theory, it can be no P ar ‘ ot p f[ t J e v P e rv different 
anvone; and, moreover, sympathy _and l duty areve 7 have a 
motives. If we feed one who is L p^ct from the motive 
pleasure in alleviating pain, it is v therefore maybe 
of doing it because it is right. Sympathy ’ t0 
more correctly classed among the aids to happiness 
»f », ooo, .,».f »- 
