276 
constitution, wholly unextended, and have no temporal solidity, 
either for our hands to grasp or retain, as aeriform bodies, in 
space. The latter are solid and useful occupanfcs of places m 
hm \i. The issue is this. All true Anthropology has not only 
a moral origin, but a moral tendency, and I submit, with 
becoming deference, that no Anthropologist, m the present 
state of Science, is justified in being so dogmatically 
However much he may be “ distinguished for his knowledge 
of strange peculiarities, observed by religions Muscovites, 
called Scoptsi, or the physical characteristics of ancient 
organic remains — force and matter — the plurality of the 
Human Bace— the mythological tales of savage Africa-ot 
the Esquimaux of Greenland, or the lacustrine babitoons of 
“ primeval ” Man— anti-missionary labours— pre-historic hut- 
circles — shell-mounds — tumuli — the phenomena of hybndity 
in the genus Homo— the Negro’s place m Jamaica, or ■else- 
where—" religious ” faiths, embodied m ancient name*— 
artificial deformities of crania, heredity— inequality cerebral 
physiology, or materialism— in short, he may know thoroughly 
fell the S whole anthropology of primitive peoples, however 
scientifically distinguished in all tins one-sided lo , | P 'j 
he k acquainted only with Man in his physical and menta 
aspects? Wisdom abideth not in thcmj he cannot thus 
Xiof foms* "orLhe^Ld 11 Mind"' VhSounfof patient 
rrjKWif 
S&sarJ? s# -a 
Anthropologist in question has gratuitously and e^oneomy 
adopted a vfcious, mutilated, and completely . J 
The" soul of Man speaks all Languages, and m all nations ,bt 
its nature or constitution is purely spiritual. In physical 
hktorv man is closely allied to animals both m flesh and 
blood? and with them he enjoys, somewhat in com ™ on ’>°* 
mental and bodily phenomena. 
Ss of the Universe. Vll, the being who is the subject or 
object of all these inquiries m natural ^storyisatt,, < d 
PfTwewed in the exclusive light of Physical Science, 
