108 
- . — * - 
boundless in its capaci y chronological synchronism of 
argument rightly, it stands or falls with tlm ch_ m> and of 
Moses and Tuthmosis, or, as ^ o{ conrSe! that that synchronism 
Joseph and Pharaoh Apop • Sav il e brings several points -which 
is correct, I am ready to grant h M ^ Mr gavi i e &ir grounds 
fairly illustrate his position , but t q oint ? I think he speaks 
£,szrsr„ l :s^srsr-«,- 
in mode P rn times, 
And in another sentence, in his .1st section, he is still more confident, for 
“ I believe it to be as f„ the 
^hlrt^ 
Now, it will be my object 
by pointing out what I consider to b j 0S eph told his brethren 
In L 13th section Mr. Savile tnes tc . show that; Ration to Pharaoh, 
to tell Pharaoh that they were shephe L h erd kings. That is Mr. Savile’s 
because Pharaoh himself was one of th *epW k g Assuming 
argument ; but it might oZ^J shepherds were 
that Pharaoh was not _ a shepherd k g, ^d ^ have told his brethren 
held in abomination in Egyp , ^ far awa y as pos- 
t0 declare that they were insult. That, I 
sible, in the land of Goshen, out o . the other . (Hear, hear.) Then, 
maintain, is quite as natural a supp Avaris was « the city 
in his 16th section, Mr. Savile maintains that the c y ^ i Tentme t0 cri . 
of the Hebrews,” and that that is ^varis was “ the city of 
ticise that point. Assuming d ^ origm because it 
I;S5iw 
* See Canon Cook On tU Bearings of Egyv tian IMo ny 
tench, Speaker s CommenUr^ v^p. ^ t t for shepherds 
:n y d1o^h“”Se -an abearance always given to them.-En. 
