„ ot rise or set ; but we constantly use the phrase “ rising” or “ setting ” 
as appUedl the suUve cannot help it, it is the popular language which we 
!re always using ; but when we use philosophical language we attach 
are always usm e , concluding my observations, 
TSL - -7 d ~ 
and distinct. I only quote it to show that a tripart^dxjon rnims 
nature is one that may be ofThe world, 
trclml D cXr e endoTeT them”-the beasts that ^^‘‘“^orte 
0f Mr Stranger,! may perhaps be permitted to offer a 
fe “obse'rvations on this subject, and X will endeavour not to «ess he 
ten minutes’ limit which I understand is imposed upon all the speake • 
I aaree upon one point, with the gentleman who has just sat down^for I thi 
Lerels some Jfusiok of thought in Mr. Graham’s paper. With som 
parts I do most cordially agree, but I as cordially dissent 
: r- r £ 
:^sS8FS53£b 
from what he has said about the heart. vv “ , , , y,.- well 
in the tripartite division of man’s nature, beheve that n .a 
sustained and established by the Scnptu-s I d ° ^ e ^ o{the iJ rip . 
rXTc^ 
^thJ'fif^chapter^f^e^iS Epistle to the in several 
parts are combined-" your whole spirit, and rfthe First Epistle 
portant point which has been ignore y f y; s constituted 
given, that every man has a spirit in him which is part 
nature 
God.” 
Now that is a most important 
Mr. Heard’s view, that the spirit died at the tall, ana t ^ of man 
the New Testament, but also of the Old. 
