the Free Martin. 2 91 
tfie rings of the abdominal mufcles to the fefticles, as it 
does in the ridgill fh) . 
There were the two bags placed behind the bladder, 
between it and the uterus. Their dudls opened into the 
vagina , a very little way beyond the opening of the ure- 
thra ; but there was nothing iimilar to the vafa defe- 
rentia. 
As the external parts had more of the cow than the 
bull, the clytorisy which may alfo be reckoned an exter- 
nal part, was alfo Iimilar to that of the cow; not at ail in 
a middle ftate between the penis of the bull and the cly- 
toris of the cow, as I have defcribed in the hermaphro- 
dite horfe. There were four teats; the glandular part of 
the udder was but fmall. 
This animal cannot be faid to have been a mixture of 
all the parts of both fexes, for the clytoris had nothing 
iimilar to the penis in the male, and was different in the 
cow part, in having nothing Iimilar to the ovaria, nor 
was the uterus a cavity. 
(h) Although I call thefe bodies tefticles for the reafon given, yet they were 
only imitations of fuch, for when cut into they had nothing of the ftrusfture 
of the tefticle: not being Iimilar to any thing in nature, they had more the 
appearance of difeafe. From the feeming imperfe&ion of the animal itfelf, it 
was not to be fuppofed that they fhould be tefticles, for then the ammaiftiould 
have partook of the bull, which it certainly did not. 
Mr,. 
F B ^ 
