yi lvb\ Morgan on Survivorjhips . 
mod of them (efpecially thofe in which three lives are con- 
cerned) of no ufe> it will be unneceflary to take notice of 
what he has done on the fubjedh With regard to the latter, 
whofe rule is not only the foie guide for determining the value 
of this reverfion, but alfo the fource from which a great va- 
riety of other problems are folved, perhaps it may not be 
improper to examine how far his folution is to be depended 
upon ; and the following examples have therefore been com- 
puted for this purpofe. 
1 TABLE I. 
Value, by Simpson’s rule, of True value of the fame 
J~. IOO. payable on the contingent reversion computed from 
reverfion Specified in this pro- the firft rule in the fore- 
c, 
Ages of 
B. 
A. 
b!em, when either C or B are el- 
deft, according to the Northamp- 
ton Table and at 4 per cent. 
going folution. 
So 
7 ° 
40 
I.926 
arm e» 
1.179 
75 
65 
2 5 
1.873 
- 
1.032 
6 5 
5 ° 
1 5 
- 2.O9O 
- 
1.690 
7 ° 
80 
40 
6.615 
- 
6.117, 
5 ° 
6 5 
J 5 
5.580 
- 
3-879 
OO 
78 
20 
2 - 5 8 3 
- 
I.982 
45 
60 
1 2 
5 - 57 1 
- 
4-133 
6o 
45 
1 2 
2.292 
\ 
■1 a 
1.686 
c. 
Ages. 
B. 
A. 
TABLE II. 
Value of the fame reverfion by 
Simpson’s rule, when A. is the 
oldelt of the three lives. 
True value of the fam 
reverfion by the fecond rul 
in the foregoing folution. 
24 
65 
75 
34.636 
ca» 
3 r - 79 2 
65 
24 
75 
6.305 
- 
7-895 
49 
9 
69 
7 - 35 1 
- 
5.960 
1 8 
78 
78 
37-554 
773 C 
33.019 
TABLE 
