446 Dr. Herschel’s Obfervations on the 
Sept. 17. 19 48. The 3d fat. i| dia. of the ring precedin t 
the projection (P). 
Sept. 18. 21 I5 V J of the projection, or if dia. of the fa 
tellite preceding the edge of the ring. 
21 45. 5 of the projection preceding R. 
2! 53. The 3d almoft touches the R. 
21 59. Quite clofe to the ring, and a little north. 
22. 7. Not quite fo near but that I can ftill fee a fmall 
divifion. 
22 20. With 157, I can no longer fee a divifion between the 
3d fatellite and the R. 
22 22. With 300, the fat. is completely joined to the R. 
but fo as to make it appear a little longer, and a very little 
knotty towards the north (Q). 
Sept. 20. 23 27. The 3d fat. i| projection f. R. It is within 
lefs than the diameter of the 2d fatellite preceding the 2d, and 
a little more fouth (R). 
23 51. The 3d fat. is now more feparated from the 2d. 
0 45. 1 ? projection f. R. 
1 22. 1 projection f. R. 
Sept. 21. 21 15. 2§ projections preceding the edge. 
22 44. Near 3 projections p. R. (S). 
Sept. 23. 22 51. The 3d fat. 1 projection f. the edge (T). 
Sept. 24. 19 56. ii dia. of R. f. the edge j about 2 diame- 
ters of the 4th fatellite farther from R. than the 4th, and a 
little more fouth. 
20 48. It advances towards a conjunction with the 4th. 
I It O '■ I U ° 
(P) 7 50 55. 256,9. (Q) 10 20 34. 345,0. 
(R) n 17 33. 147,6. (S) 10 30 44. 224,8. 
(T) IO 29 52. 24,3. 
22 47. 
