214 Dr. Herschel's Method of observing the 
79 Is less than 8 Pegasi, contrary to the catalogue. The 
difference between 2 . 1m and 3m would be striking, if the low- 
ness of the situation of 79 did not render its real magnitude 
very uncertain. In my estimation no allowance is made for 
that low situation. In the observations there is no magnitude 
to either of these stars. 
80 There are two stars, the smallest of which agrees 
best with the place of 80 in Atlas, but neither of them 
seems to accord completely in relative situation with 81 and 
82. In one of my sweeps a star, supposed to be 8c, was 
taken with the following deduction ; 44 Sept. 12, 1785. This 
star requires a correction of — i' 13" in time of RA, and — 6' 
in PD/' 
84 Is larger than 87, contrary to the catalogue. In the 
observations they are both 8m. 
85 Is much less than 92, which does not agree with the 
magnitudes of the catalogue. In the observations it is marked 
8m. 
86 Is larger than 89, contrary to the catalogue. There is 
no magnitude to either of these stars in the observations. 
88. 44 Oct. 13, 1786, 20-feet reflector, 4.3m/' Flamsteed's 
observations- give it 4m. 
89 Is larger than 101 and 104, contrary to the catalogue. 
In the observations 104 is 6m. 
94 Is larger than 95, contrary to the catalogue. In the ob- 
servations they are both 5m. 
96. 44 Sept. 12, 1783, 6m.” In Flamsteed's observations 
it is also marked 6m. 
