Dr. Herschel’s Method of observing the 
224 
Notes to Pegasus. 
2. The expressions 2 , 16 and 2 .13 shew that this star is 
over-rated in the catalogue. In Flamsteed’s observations it 
stands 6m. 
8 Is larger than 53 and 54, contrary to the catalogue. In 
the observations are no magnitudes of these stars. 
18 Is not sufficiently distinguished from 19 to agree with the 
magnitudes of the catalogue. In Flamsteed’s observations 
18 is marked once 5m, once 6m, and once 7m ; and 19 is 7m. 
20. “ Oct. 19, 1784, 7m.” In Flamsteed’s observations 
it stands 6m. 
21 Is less than 17, contrary to the catalogue. It is also con- 
trary to the magnitudes given in the observations. If there 
be any accuracy in the magnitudes of the catalogue and of the 
observations, we ought to ldok upon this star as changeable ; 
for the latter give it once 3m, and once 6m, while the. former 
has 5m. 
27. “ Sept. 6, 1784, 6m.” In Flamsteed’s observations 
there is no magnitude of this star. 
31 Is no larger than 50, contrary to the catalogue, “ Sept. 
5, 1784, 6m,” and “ Oct. 19, 1784, 5.6m.” Flamsteed’s 
observations give it twice 3m, and 50 also 3m. 
32. “ Sept. 8, 1784, 6 .5m.” In Flamsteed’s observations 
it stands once 4m, and once 5m. 
42 Is less than 48, contrary to the catalogue. But in the 
observations there is no magnitude to 48. “ Sept. 19, 1784, 
48 (f.) 4.3m." 
43 Is less than 56, contrary to the catalogue. It is also 
