comparative Brightness of the Stars. 301 
63 There is no observation of this star, nor does it exist. 
The star of which the brightness is given in my catalogue, is 
at some distance from the place assigned in the British cata- 
logue. Flamsteed observed a star, page 444, which will be 
No. 2 69 in Miss Herschel’s manuscript catalogue. This, 
with an error in the calculation of the PD, probably occa- 
sioned the insertion of 63. And if this be the star, the PD of 
the British catalogue must be corrected -f- 3 0 . 
71 Has never been observed by Flamsteed, nor does it 
exist. A small error in the calculation of one of the four ob- 
servations of 70, may have produced it. 
80 and 81 Were never observed. The two stars v 24 and 25 
Draconis, miscalled < in Flamsteed’s observations, page 55 and 
17 5, with an error of PD, accounts for the insertion of these 
stars. See Mr. Bode’s Jahr-Buch for 1787, page 194. 
93 The PD is marked : : (doubtful), in the British catalogue ; 
but the observation of Flamsteed, page 320, is complete. 
Pegasus. 
6 Is the same star with 25 Aquarii. 
11 Is the same star with 27 Aquarii. 
Additional Notes to the Stars in the Second Catalogue of the 
comparative Brightness of the Stars. 
Aries. 
1 There is an observation of a star by Flamsteed, which 
being calculated with an error of io' of time in RA, would 
produce 1 Arietis ; we may therefore correct the British cata- 
Rr 2 
