302 Dr. Herschel’s Third Catalogue of the 
logue RA -{- io # , and the star will be found to exist. In Miss 
Herschel's manuscript catalogue it is No. 143. 
2 Is the same star with 1 07 Piscium. 
38 is the same star with 88 Ceti. In three observations, 
page 85, 285, and 485, Flamsteed has called it Arietis ; and 
on page 481 he has called it Ceti. See also Mr. Bode’s Jahr - 
Buck for 1793, page 200. 
50 By Flamsteed's observation, page 273. the catalogue 
requires — i' in time of RA. 
Cassiopea. 
3 The place in the catalogue by two observations of Flam- 
steed requires -f- 5'i of time in RA, and 7' of PD. 
8 Is marked : : but has four complete observations on page 
140, 144, 145, and 147. 
29 There is an observation of Flamsteed on page 144 
which has produced this star, but the time of it requires a 
correction of -f- 6 ' ; and it will then belong to 32. That 
this correction should be used, will appear when we com- 
pare this observation with another on page 213. I11 both 
places a star which is not inserted in the British catalogue, but 
which is No. 384 of Miss Herschel’s manuscript catalogue, 
was taken at the same time. On, page 144 it is “ Duarum 
“ infra y , versus polum, borealis. Simul fere transit, austrea;" 
and on page 213 we have “ post transitum" for the new star, 
and “ cum priore ” for 32 ; and in both places the zenith-dis- 
tance perfectly shews that they were the same stars : the 32d 
and a star south of it. And they are now both in the places 
where Flamsteed has observed them. 
