304 Dr. Herschel’s Third Catalogue of the 
servations of the star, and has always called it v, except once 
on page 482, where it is without letter, and where the constel- 
lation is marked Aquarii ; now, as there was immediately fol- 
lowing an observation of 54 Ceti, and Aquarius was evidently 
wrong, the star has been put in Cetus. 
38 By Flamsteed’s observation, page 358, the RA in the 
British catalogue requires a correction of — 3' in time. 
74 Flamsteed has no observation of this star, nor can I 
find it in any other catalogue. The place of it is so distant 
from other stars of the British catalogue, that my estimation 
of brightness may belong to some star not far from the situa- 
tion assigned, and that the star of the British catalogue may 
not exist. 
88 Is the same with 38 Arietis. See Mr. Bode’s Jabr-Bucb 
for 1793, page 200. 
Eridanus. 
44 In the British catalogue is marked : : The single obser- 
vation of Flamsteed, page 133, is perfect, all but a difference 
of 3' between the zenith-distance by the diagonal lines and by 
the screw. 
43 Marked : : has a complete observation, page 133. 
68 Marked : : has a complete observation, page 146. 
Gemini. 
30 There is no observation on this star. The star I have 
given is at a considerable distance from the place assigned by 
the British catalogue, so that in fact the star of the catalogue 
does not exist. It has been inserted in the British catalogue by 
a mistake in the calculation of a star which is about i°49 / more 
