324 Dr. Herschel's Third Catalogue , &c. 
has seven complete observations of this star; therefore the 
marks : : should be out. 
63 There is no observation of this star; but supposing an 
error of -j- 2' 14" of time in RA, and of -|- o' 22" in PD, it 
will then agree with No. 33 of Miss Herschel's manuscript 
catalogue. I have taken the comparative brightness of that 
star, supposing it to be 63. 
64 and 65 Have no observation by Flamsteed; but their 
insertion has been accounted for by Mr. Bode in his Jahr- 
Buch for 1793, page 195. He mentions Flamsteed's two ob- 
servations on page 17 and 94. There is a third on page 292, 
which confirms what Mr. Bode says. The 64 of which I give 
the brightness, is not far from the place assigned to it in the 
British catalogue. It is No. 1 in Miss Herschel's manuscript 
catalogue. 
76 There is no observation of this star. A mistake of 41' in 
PD in calculating one of the four observations of 8 Mono- 
cerotis, might occasion its insertion 
Slough, near Windsor, 
April 12 , 1797. 
WM. HERSCHEL 
