342 
BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF FISHERIES. 
Miger, Felix, et Lancret — Continued. 
1809. M6moires sur les larves d’insectes Col6opteres aquatiques. 1. Memoire but le grand 
Hydrophile. Annales, Museum nationale d’histoire naturelle, T. 14, pp. 441-459, PI. 28, 9 
figs. Paris. 
Moore, Emmeline. 
1920. Some plants of importance in pondfish culture. Appendix IV, Report of the U. S. Commis- 
sioner of Fisheries for 1919. Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 881, 20 pp., 1 map, 7 
tables. Washington. 
Mulsant, E. 
1844. Historie naturelle des Col4opt&res de France. Vol. 3, Palpicomes, 196 pp., 1 pi. Paris et 
Lyon. 
Mulsant, E., et Cl. Rey. 
1861. Description d’une espece nouvelle d’Ochthebius [lejolissi] et de la larve de cet insects. 
Memoir es, Society Imperiale des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg, T. VIII, pp. 181-189, 
1 pi. 
Muttkowski, Richard Anthony. 
1918. The fauna of Lake Mendota. A qualitative and quantitative survey with special reference 
to the insects. Transactions, Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, Vol. XIX, 
Part I, pp. 374-482, 9 tables. Madison. 
Needham, James G. 
1904. Beetle drift on Lake Michigan. The Canadian Entomologist, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 294-296. 
London, Canada. 
1907. Notes on aquatic insects of Walnut Lake. See Hankinson, 1907. 
1917. The insect drift of lake shores. The Canadian Entomologist, Vol. XLIX, pp. 129-137. 
London, Canada. 
1918. Aquatic insects. In Fresh-water biology, by Henry B. Ward and George C. Whipple, Ch. 
XXVII, pp. 876-946, Figs. 1354-1392. John Wiley & Sons (Inc.). New York and London. 
Needham, James G., and J. T. Lloyd. 
1916. The life of inland waters. 8°, 438 pp., 244 text figs. Ithaca, N. Y. 
Needham, James G., and Helen V. Williamson. 
1907. Observations on the natural history of diving beetles. The American Naturalist, Vol. XLI, 
pp. 477-494, 8 figs. Boston. [A list of Dytiscidse found in the “Gym Pond” at Lake 
Forest, with notes on their habits and life histories.] 
Orchymont, A. d’. 
1913. Contribution & P etude des larves hydrophilides. Annales de Biologie Lacustre, T. 6, pp. 
173-214, 23 figs. Bruxelles. [Described and figured the larvae of several European genera 
and gave a classification of genera according to their known larvae.] 
Paganetti-Hummler, G. 
1899. Coleopterologische Liebesszenen der Ochthebien. Zeitschrift fur Entomologie, Dritte 
Reihe, Bd. 4, p. 107. Breslau. 
Pearse, A. S. 
1918. The food of the shore fishes of certain Wisconsin Lakes. Bulletin, U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, 
Vol. XXXV, 1915-16 (1918), pp. 215-292. Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 856. 
Washington. 
Perris, Edouard. 
1876. Nouvelles promenades entomologiques. Annales, Society Entomologique de France, S4rie 
5, T. VI, pp. 171-244. Paris. [Heleophorus rugosus, pp. 183-185.] 
Planet, Louis. 
1891. Developpement de PHydrophile brun ( Hydrophilus piceus). Hydrophilus piceus. Meta- 
morphoses. Le Naturaliste, 2 e S4rie, 13® Annee, pp. 259-260. Paris. 
Plateau, Felix. 
1872. Un mot sur le mode d’ adherence des males de Dytiseides aux femelles pendant l’acte de l’ac- 
couplement. Annales, Societe Entomologique de Belgique, T. 15, 1871-72, pp. 205-242. 
Bruxelles. [Proved by experiment that a freshly killed Dytiscus marginalis, when its 
suckers were applied to a glass cylinder, could support more than 13 times its own weight. 
1876. Note sur une secretion propre aux Coleopt4res Dytiseides. Ibid., T. 19, pp. 1-10. 
